2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-2654-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Questionnaire surveys - sources of error and implications for design, reporting and appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the restrictions imposed because of the pandemic, it was only possible to perform an online survey study to approach the participants. This could lead to potential survey error in which the true situation may deviate from the reported situation 52 . The analysis of the representation of the respondents did not show large deviations from the general Dutch oral health care practitioner population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the restrictions imposed because of the pandemic, it was only possible to perform an online survey study to approach the participants. This could lead to potential survey error in which the true situation may deviate from the reported situation 52 . The analysis of the representation of the respondents did not show large deviations from the general Dutch oral health care practitioner population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of this study was reported using the RISQ (Reporting items for surveys and questionnaires) guidelines. 15 There was more or less equal distribution of participants with post quali cation experience, of which 32.7% have been practicing between 0-10 years, 32.7% have been practicing for 11-20 years and 34.5% having > 20 years' experience (Table 1). The oldest year of quali cation was 1981 and the most recent graduate quali ed in 2022.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Firstly, it was conducted in one study center with small sample size, limiting generalizability. However, all the center’s eligible oncology nurses responded, possibly attributed to response enhancement measures (verbal reminders), thereby reducing non-response bias [ 17 ]. Secondly, the data collected was based on the nurses’ self-reported attitudes and practices which could be subjected to recall bias [ 18 ], and social desirability bias [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%