1996
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.78b2.0780185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: W e have developed a 12-item questionnaire for patients having a total knee replacement (TKR). We made a prospective study of 117 patients before operation and at follow-up six months later, asking them to complete the new questionnaire and the form SF36. Some also filled in the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). An orthopaedic surgeon completed the American Knee Society (AKS) clinical score. The single score derived from the new questionnaire had high internal consistency, and its reproducibility… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
841
1
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,139 publications
(860 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
7
841
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The patient-reported outcome measures most often used to assess the effects of THR include well-validated selfassessment measures of OA severity such as the Oxford Hip Score (13) or Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) (14), which assess pain, stiffness, and function. Most studies that report such data have treated the outcome measure as a continuous variable, and simply recorded the mean scores before and after surgery (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient-reported outcome measures most often used to assess the effects of THR include well-validated selfassessment measures of OA severity such as the Oxford Hip Score (13) or Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) (14), which assess pain, stiffness, and function. Most studies that report such data have treated the outcome measure as a continuous variable, and simply recorded the mean scores before and after surgery (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients in whom the aforementioned investigations were equivocal in deciding the suitability or otherwise for traditional hip resurfacing, patients were consented for both procedures and the assessment was made on the operating table. Preoperative Oxford Hip Score (OHS) [16] and UCLA hip score [51] were recorded in all patients. All operations were performed using a posterior approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients' median OHS (using the 48-point OHS) improved from 26 (range, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] preoperatively to 46 (range, [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], and UCLA score improved from 5 (range, 2-8) to 8 (range, 4-10) at latest review (paired t-test p \ 0.001 for both). There was no difference in median [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] or in the median postoperative UCLA scores between males (8; range, 5-10) and females (8; range, 4-10) (Mann-Whitney U p = 0.293 and p = 0.115, respectively).…”
Section: Survivorship and Hip Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthopaedic outcome was measured using the WOMAC [7][8][9][10], the Harris hip score [35] (HHS), and the Oxford Hip Score [23] (OHS). In contrast to the HHS, the patient completes the OHS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%