2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1601219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasiclassical and semiclassical wave-packet dynamics in periodic potentials

Abstract: The capability of quasiclassical and semiclassical methods to describe quantum dynamics in a periodic potential is investigated. Due to the periodicity of the potential, such systems may exhibit prominent quantum interference effects and, therefore, provide a particular challenge to methods based on classical approximations. Adopting a simple model for an isomerization reaction, we study the dynamics for different initial preparations as well as different dynamical observables. The quasiclassical calculations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis leading to the minimum uncertainty delivers a lowering operator, and this suggests that one solve eq III.1 by a factorization approach. In the supersymmetry approach, we expect to factor the Schro ¨dinger equation in the form 11,12 where W(φ) is the superpotential, in terms of which 7,8 As is well-known, eq III.5 is the Riccati substitution for the Schro ¨dinger equation, and in this case, we immediately identify W(φ) as (compare eq III.7 with eq III.4) eq III.7 with eq III. 4.…”
Section: Supersymmetric Quantum Dynamics Of the Hindered Rotormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis leading to the minimum uncertainty delivers a lowering operator, and this suggests that one solve eq III.1 by a factorization approach. In the supersymmetry approach, we expect to factor the Schro ¨dinger equation in the form 11,12 where W(φ) is the superpotential, in terms of which 7,8 As is well-known, eq III.5 is the Riccati substitution for the Schro ¨dinger equation, and in this case, we immediately identify W(φ) as (compare eq III.7 with eq III.4) eq III.7 with eq III. 4.…”
Section: Supersymmetric Quantum Dynamics Of the Hindered Rotormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis leading to the minimum uncertainty delivers a lowering operator, and this suggests that one solve eq by a factorization approach. In the supersymmetry approach, we expect to factor the Schrödinger equation in the form , true[ normald normald normalφ + W ( φ ) true] true[ d d φ + W ( φ ) true] ψ = E ψ where W (φ) is the superpotential, in terms of which , V ± ( φ ) = W 2 ( φ ) d d φ W ( φ ) …”
Section: Supersymmetric Quantum Dynamics Of the Hindered Rotormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Probably, the transition between both can be best scrutinized by exploiting phase-space methods [58][59][60]. This opens up the possibility of gaining some information about the nonclassical behavior with a quasiclassical description that employs essentially classical trajectories, while the correct quantum initial state is taken into account via, e.g., the Wigner function [61][62][63]. Despite some problems with the interpretation, the Wigner function has enjoyed substantial attention in various domains of physics [64] and has already been applied to some nonlinear problems in quantum optics [65][66][67][68][69].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%