2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.085121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Monte Carlo study of the three-dimensional spin-polarized homogeneous electron gas

Abstract: We have studied the spin-polarized three-dimensional homogeneous electron gas using the diffusion quantum Monte Carlo method, with trial wave functions including backflow and three-body correlations in the Jastrow factor, and we have used twist averaging to reduce finite-size effects. Calculations of the pair-correlation function, including the on-top pair density, as well as the structure factor and the total energy, are reported for systems of 118 electrons in the density range r s = 0.5-20 a.u., and for spi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
131
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
9
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It approximates the local XC energy per particle, ε xc , as the value for the HEG at the local density, ε LDA xc (n(r)) ≈ ε HEG xc (n)| n=n(r) [also see Eq. (3) [5] for the spin-polarized T = 0 K HEG also validate the spininterpolation formulae used in that case, the local spin density approximation (LSDA). All more refined ε xc approximations reduce to the LSDA in the weak inhomogeneity limit.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It approximates the local XC energy per particle, ε xc , as the value for the HEG at the local density, ε LDA xc (n(r)) ≈ ε HEG xc (n)| n=n(r) [also see Eq. (3) [5] for the spin-polarized T = 0 K HEG also validate the spininterpolation formulae used in that case, the local spin density approximation (LSDA). All more refined ε xc approximations reduce to the LSDA in the weak inhomogeneity limit.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational implementation is via parametrizations [2,3] of HEG quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) data [4]. Recent QMC results [5] for the spin-polarized T = 0 K HEG also validate the spininterpolation formulae used in that case, the local spin density approximation (LSDA). All more refined ε xc approximations reduce to the LSDA in the weak inhomogeneity limit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We shall address these questions by accurately determiningω ex (q), "the oscillator strength" of the pole f ex (q), and S(q, ω) for r s from r c s up to about 20 in which the ground state has already been confirmed to be a paramagnetic metal. 6 A straightforward way of obtaining accurate results for S(q, ω) is to perform the highly self-consistent calculation in the GWΓ scheme 22 which includes the vertex function Γ satisfying the Ward identity (WI), 23,24 just as done for S(q, ω) for r s ≤ 5, 25 but it turns out that this GWΓ does not work well in the dielectric-catastrophe regime. Thus it is revised into the GWΓ WI scheme 10,26 to obtain the self-consistent results for S(q, ω) as well as n(p) up to r s = 10, but there still remains the problem of reaching a fully self-consistent solution for r s > 10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) calculations are done to analyze the ground-state phases, including spin polarization, in the wide range of r s 5 and recently for 0.5 ≤ r s ≤ 20 in more detail 6 , but we do not know the precise behavior of other physical quantities, such as the momentum distribution function n(p) for r s > 5. It is true that some quantum Monte Carlo calculations are done to obtain n(p) for r s ≤ 10, 7,8 but the results are not very accurate due probably to large size effects and improper starting trial functions, judging from the assessment of their accuracy by the sum rules for n(p).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%