2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Dissipative Dynamics (QDD): A real-time real-space approach to far-off-equilibrium dynamics in finite electron systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XC [n(t)](r) which can be a useful analysis tool in cases where the exact groundstate xc potential can be computed (usually model 1D systems). Due to the lack of memory, the adiabatic approximation leads to large errors in some applications, sometimes failing completely [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60], but in other cases it has been found to yield good predictions [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], even when the system is far from a ground-state. It is not completely understood why: possible reasons include, that the adiabatic approximation satisfies a number of exact conditions that are important in the time-dependent case [2], that in some applications a strong external field dominates over xc effects in driving the dynamics and that partial compensation of selfinteraction in the Hartree potential, even at the groundstate level, is enough, especially when the observables involve averaging over the details of the density distribution.…”
Section: A Memory: History and Initial-state Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…XC [n(t)](r) which can be a useful analysis tool in cases where the exact groundstate xc potential can be computed (usually model 1D systems). Due to the lack of memory, the adiabatic approximation leads to large errors in some applications, sometimes failing completely [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60], but in other cases it has been found to yield good predictions [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], even when the system is far from a ground-state. It is not completely understood why: possible reasons include, that the adiabatic approximation satisfies a number of exact conditions that are important in the time-dependent case [2], that in some applications a strong external field dominates over xc effects in driving the dynamics and that partial compensation of selfinteraction in the Hartree potential, even at the groundstate level, is enough, especially when the observables involve averaging over the details of the density distribution.…”
Section: A Memory: History and Initial-state Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a) and 2(a), a = 1, the 50:50 superposition. In exact TDDFT, the density of this interacting state as a function of time n(r, t) = 1 1 + |a| 2 n 0 (r) + |a| 2 n 1 (r) + 2an 01 (r) cos(ωt) (11) where n q (r) = 2 |Ψ q (r, r 2 )| 2 d 3 r 2 , q = 0, 1 and n 01 (r) = 2 Ψ 0 (r, r 2 )Ψ 1 (r, r 2 )d 3 r 2 , is exactly reproduced by the non-interacting KS electrons.…”
Section: Case Study: Dynamics In the Helium Atommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Closer inspection of the evolving dipole on a logarithmic scale (not shown) reveals that the envelope of the dipole signal up to 8 fs increases exponentially, as is typical for an instability. In order not to be fooled by artifacts, we have scrutinized our numerical treatment by varying numerical parameters and by performing control calculations using two other full 3D computer packages (EDAMAME [43] and QDD [36]). The effect persists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%