Quantitative X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Biomass (Switchgrass, Corn Stover, Eucalyptus, Beech, and Pine Wood) with a Typical Commercial Multi-Element Method on a WD-XRF Spectrometer

Abstract

Quick and reliable inorganic elemental chemical analysis of biomass (incl. solid biofuels) is of importance in the increasing utilization and trade of biomass. In particular, it is important for the exploitation of contaminated / dirty biomass / biomass waste, and potentially also as a tool in ascertaining the type/origin of biomass. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry performed directly on the raw biomass with limited prior sample preparation is an attractive method for performing such inorganic elemental analysis. In the present study we therefore carefully investigate the performance of a commercial multi-element standardless XRF method by analyzing 5 common biomass types (switchgrass, corn stover, eucalyptus, beech, and pine wood). Sample preparation involves milling the raw biomass using cutter and rotor mills (avoiding ball-milling) and cold-pressing the powdered samples into pellets using binder (vax).XRF users often rely on this type of commercial pre-calibrated or 'standardless' methods delivered with their XRF spectrometer. However, these methods are often sold without any guarantee on performance. We recently demonstrated the quite good performance of a typical commercial pre-calibrated / standardless method when analyzing biomass in the ideal form of certified reference material. In the present article, we report now on analysis of common raw biomass using the same method purchased with a 4 kW wavelength dispersive (WD) XRF spectrometer. The accuracy (trueness and precision) is determined by comparing the XRF data with the elemental composition obtained by standard elemental analysis (ICP-OES and ionchromatography). The certified elements consistently detected by the XRF are: Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, Mo. For elements above 25 ppm, the XRF data show a relative systematic error (bias, trueness) typically better than ±15% independent of the concentration. The elements present with > 1000 ppm (Mg, Si, Cl, K, Ca) consistently show a positive bias of 3 -18% relative. The relative precision (measured as the relative standard error) is better than ±5% (typically ±1%) for concentrations > 25 ppm (obtained with 10 -30 measurements). Quantifying elements below 25 ppm (Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, Mo) is possible in some cases, but it requires a more detailed study for each specific element. E.g. Cu can be determined down to a few ppm with an appropriate correction for the method bias. Occasionally, larger relative biases of up to 45% to 90% can occur for certain elements (Cl, Si) in certain samples, so care should be taken to carefully test the applied method for the particular samples and elements of interest. Quantification of silicon (Si) by XRF works well for concentrations > 100 ppm. The XRF method can further be used to estimate the ash yield from biomass combustion with a relative bias better than ±10%.It is shown that the errors on the elemental composition are dominated by systematic errors (biases) and therefore measuring the two sides of a single pellet combined with corre...

Silica Production across Candidate Lignocellulosic Biorefinery Feedstocks

“…The two reports of XRF-based Si estimation in napiergrass [11,63] have ranged from somewhat lower to somewhat higher than those in this study; however, they were both performed in tropical regions and would not provide relevant yield estimates for subtropical and temperate regions. The single report of XRF-based Si content in switchgrass [64], was based only on bulk biomass samples of unknown origin and without the associated biomass yields.…”

Fast Pyrolysis of Tropical Biomass Species and Influence of Water Pretreatment on Product Distributions

“…It has recently been demonstrated that modern X-ray fluorescence instruments can provide data that is comparable to inductively coupled plasma methods for the inorganic composition (major and minor elements) of raw biomass, i.e. without the need to ash the sample [ 28 , 29 ].…”

Low-Input Crops as Lignocellulosic Feedstock for Second-Generation Biorefineries and the Potential of Chemometrics in Biomass Quality Control

“…X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) is a rarely used analytical tool for LCF, although it is an attractive method for performing inorganic elemental analysis [133]. Even if LCF is mainly composed from organic matter and light elements that cannot be detected directly with XRF, an application of chemometric techniques to the scattering XRF profile may provide valuable information on integral LCF parameters.…”