2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0036-36342009000700005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative ultrasound and bone health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors suggested that these parameters are more useful to determine subjects with diminished bone health status. 26 The stiffness index was introduced to measure bone fragility and it is defined as a combination of normalized SOS and BUA 14 Stiffness index was calculated by the following equation:…”
Section: Anthropometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors suggested that these parameters are more useful to determine subjects with diminished bone health status. 26 The stiffness index was introduced to measure bone fragility and it is defined as a combination of normalized SOS and BUA 14 Stiffness index was calculated by the following equation:…”
Section: Anthropometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The majority of published literature on QUS has focused on the calcaneal site as it has a high metabolic activity and reflecting spine demineralization pattern. 26 Ultrasound BMD was measured by a portable ultrasound bone densitometer (GE healthcare -Achilles, USA)…”
Section: Anthropometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of SOS, the coefficient of variations (precision values) tend to be better in cortical bone compared to trabecular bone due to increased speed of sound waves in cortical bone. Similarly, BUA precision also appears to be poorer than its corresponding SOS precision in the same devices (60).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures bone mineral density (BMD), and is currently the key assessment tool for diagnosing osteoporosis [6]. However, being a 2-dimensional measure, BMD does not su ciently explain variance in fracture outcomes amongst individuals with similar BMD measures [7][8][9], thus additional bone measures may be useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, being a 2-dimensional measure, BMD does not su ciently explain variance in fracture outcomes amongst individuals with similar BMD measures [7][8][9], thus additional bone measures may be useful. Quantitative heel ultrasound (QUS) is a radiation-free, portable, non-invasive, inexpensive screening method to assess bone quality [6], measuring 3dimensional parameters such as bone structure and elasticity to explain variance in bone strength [10,11]. Trabecular bone in sites such as the vertebral body and the calcaneus is more susceptible to the effects of altered metabolism [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%