2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative structure-activity relationship study of skin sensitization of Michael acceptors based on quantum chemical descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed PLS q-RASAR model superseded the corresponding PLS QSAR model both in terms of internal and external validation metric values. Most of the previous works 68,69 have performed QSAR analysis based on chemicals that share the same mechanism of skin sensitization, and thus, lack diversity in their datasets. Moreover, the number of compounds required to train and validate their models was also quite low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The developed PLS q-RASAR model superseded the corresponding PLS QSAR model both in terms of internal and external validation metric values. Most of the previous works 68,69 have performed QSAR analysis based on chemicals that share the same mechanism of skin sensitization, and thus, lack diversity in their datasets. Moreover, the number of compounds required to train and validate their models was also quite low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of considering diverse organic chemicals, which have different mechanisms of skin sensitization, our global PLS q-RASAR model is robust and also possesses good external predictivity as evident from the different internal and external validation metrics. Manhas et al 69 performed QSAR analysis using a small dataset ( n = 30) consisting of compounds that are Michael acceptors. From their internal validation statistics, we can infer that our PLS q-RASAR model is much more robust since our cross-validated Q 2 is much higher with a similar value of R 2 despite the fact that our model has been generated on a much larger number of compounds with structurally and mechanistically diverse organic compounds.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Different Pls Plotsmentioning
confidence: 99%