Quantitative Readability Assessment of the Internal Medicine Online Patient Information on Annals.org

Abstract

Background Approximately 90% of Americans have access to the internet with the majority of people searching online for medical information pertaining to their health, or the health of loved ones. The public relies immensely on online health information to make decisions related to their healthcare. The American Medical Association (AMA) and the National Institute of Health (NIH) recommend that publicly available health-related information be written at the level of the sixth-seventh grade. Materials and methods Patient education materials available to the public on the Annals.org , a website sponsored by the American College of Physicians, were collected. All 89 patient education articles were downloaded from the website and analyzed for their ease of readability. The articles were analyzed utilizing a readability software generating five quantitative readability scores: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG). All scores, with the exception of FRE, generate a grade level that correlates with the required school-grade level to ensure adequate readability of the information. Results Eighty-nine articles were analyzed generating an average score as follows: FRE 62.8, FKGL 7.0, GFI 8.6, CLI 9.6 and SMOG 9.8. Overall, 87.6% of the articles were written at a level higher than the 7th-grade level, which is recommended by the AMA and NIH. Conclusion In an era of increased reliance on the internet for medical information pertaining to patients’ health, materials written at a higher grade than recommended has the potential to negatively impact patients’ well-being, in addition to tremendous ramifications on the healthcare system. Potentially redrafting, these articles can prove beneficial to patients who rely on these resources for making healthcare-related decisions.

Assessment of costs and insurance policies for referral treatment of equine colic

“…A Gunning Fog Score of 7–8 is ideal, and a score of 12 is considered too difficult for most people to read (Anon 2018f). Both measures have been used previously to assess the readability of medical literature 5 6 …”

Assessing the reading level of online resources on COVID-19

“…The general grade level (GGL) was calculated by averaging these five scores. Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) applies a scale ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating easier readability (Abu-Heija et al 2019). Last, websites were categorized based on reading level: a GGL < 7 was considered easy; between 7 and 10, intermediate; and > 10, hard.…”

Identification of strategies for collaboration of medical librarians with family physicians in advancing the goals of the family physician program based on experts’ viewpoints

“…Several studies have emphasized the readability, simplicity, and intelligibility of information resources for patients. 20,[25][26][27] Furthermore, in studies such as Ashrafi-Rizi et al, 28 developing credible information content for patient training has been considered one of the common responsibilities of medical librarians and healthcare professionals.…”