2022
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR

Abstract: Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an effective method for studying fish communities but allows only an estimation of relative species abundance (density/ biomass). Here, we combine metabarcoding with an estimation of the total abundance of eDNA amplified by our universal marker (teleo) using a quantitative (q)PCR approach to infer the absolute abundance of fish species. We carried out a 2850-km eDNA survey within the Danube catchment using a spatial integrative sampling protocol coupled with traditiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the proportion of preferred habitat scales disproportionately with the square of bay area, and given that the eDNA is thoroughly mixed within the bay, this results in a dilution effect. Similar patterns of DNA dilution have been observed in rivers with elevated water discharges (Pont et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Since the proportion of preferred habitat scales disproportionately with the square of bay area, and given that the eDNA is thoroughly mixed within the bay, this results in a dilution effect. Similar patterns of DNA dilution have been observed in rivers with elevated water discharges (Pont et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Even though the information obtained through metabarcoding is not as accurate as that obtained using species‐specific PCR assays, metabarcoding allows to have an overview of the trend of the community composition. Then, if some results need to be refined, species‐specific PCR (qPCR or dPCR) can be combined to metabarcoding in order to better infer the absolute abundance of fish species as performed by Pont et al (2022) who combined eDNA metabarcoding with qPCR to infer the absolute abundance of fish species. Another option is the use of internal standard DNAs which correspond to known amounts of short DNA fragments from fish species that have never been observed in a sampling area (Sato et al, 2021; Ushio et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring priority effects requires abundance data to assess positive frequency dependence patterns, but eDNA metabarcoding is still limited in providing relevant abundance data [65]. Further studies might, therefore, investigate the potential of eDNA to provide fish abundance [66,67], which will provide a finer assessment of community assembly, functional structure and the impact of human activities [68,69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%