1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199804)49:4<368::aid-mrd3>3.0.co;2-l
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Quantitative analysis of luciferase activity of viral and hybrid promoters in bovine preimplantation embryos
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
10
0
0
0
Citation Types
0
3
0
0
Year Published
1998
2003
Publication Types
Select...
10
Relationship
0
10
Authors
Journals
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
References 27 publications
0
3
0
0
“…Various promoter/enhancer-Pluc constructs were microinjected into pre-implantation bovine embryos and their expression assayed by luminometer and photon-imaging at 2 and 6 days postinjection (200). These experiments tended to document the persistence of early somatic cell promoter activation during embryonic development.…”
Section: Imaging Luciferase In Transgenic Animals
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various promoter/enhancer-Pluc constructs were microinjected into pre-implantation bovine embryos and their expression assayed by luminometer and photon-imaging at 2 and 6 days postinjection (200). These experiments tended to document the persistence of early somatic cell promoter activation during embryonic development.…”
Section: Imaging Luciferase In Transgenic Animals
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiment the chicken β-actin promoter was used. According to Nakamura et al (1998) this promoter, with its luciferase reporter gene was expressed more intensively in bovine morulae and blastocysts than gene constructs consisting of thymidine kinase with SV40 early promoters. From three transgenic embryos, one embryo was 100% GFP positive.…”
Section: The Identification and Selection Of The Gfp Positive Bovine
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for the production of large transgenic animals such as a cattle, detection of the transgene at the pre-implantation stage would be desirable, considering the long gestation period and limited number of offspring. In bovine studies, although several non-invasive methods using firefly luciferase as a marker [7,8,10] or neomycin resistance gene [2] have been reported for selection of the transgenic embryos, the former method requires a step for loading the substrate (luciferin) inside the cells, and the substrate is known to be toxic, whereas the latter requires the presence of neomycin in the culture medium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
