A small but determined group of researchers again argues that the Vinland map is authentic.The 47-year-old controversy isn't going away.
AN INKY CONTROVERSY LIVESS ince the Vinland map suddenly and mysteriously turned up in a Geneva bookstore in 1957, its faded lines have placed analytical chemists at the center of a raging debate over the authenticity of one of American history's most intriguing documents. The drawing on an approximately 550-year-old parchment shows a large island in the western Atlantic in the general location of Canada, described on the map as "even having vines" and hence named Vinland. If authentic, the map would be the earliest known cartographic representation of America.Many analytical chemists are convinced the map is a fraud. But like an extinguished forest fire that flames anew with each fresh wind, the controversy rekindles itself-most recently in four letters in this journal (1-4). The map was also the subject of a talk at the American Chemical Society's national meeting in August 2004. The linchpin in the skeptics' case is Walter McCrone's conclusion that anatase (TiO 2 ) particles taken from the map could only have originated after 1917, from a commercially produced pigment (5 ). McCrone, a distinguished chem-