2010
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.33.738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analyses of CD133 Expression Facilitate Researches on Tumor Stem Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…52 However, the hypothesis that AC133 recognizes a glycosylated epitope was questioned, 27 and and CD133 þ subpopulations in vitro as verified in western blot analyses were included in our study because a CD133 þ SW620 subfraction was also reported earlier to result in faster tumor formation and larger xenografts after subcutaneous or orthotopic injection into NOD/SCID or nude mice. 23,58 Our data, however, reveal, that CD133 À and CD133 þ SW620 subpopulations neither differ in clonogenic survival in vitro nor in tumor formation capacity in NMRI (nu/nu) mice. And, the CD133 À population of this cell line also appeared to rapidly re-express CD133 protein for presentation on the cell surface, a modulation particularly induced after in vivo engraftment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…52 However, the hypothesis that AC133 recognizes a glycosylated epitope was questioned, 27 and and CD133 þ subpopulations in vitro as verified in western blot analyses were included in our study because a CD133 þ SW620 subfraction was also reported earlier to result in faster tumor formation and larger xenografts after subcutaneous or orthotopic injection into NOD/SCID or nude mice. 23,58 Our data, however, reveal, that CD133 À and CD133 þ SW620 subpopulations neither differ in clonogenic survival in vitro nor in tumor formation capacity in NMRI (nu/nu) mice. And, the CD133 À population of this cell line also appeared to rapidly re-express CD133 protein for presentation on the cell surface, a modulation particularly induced after in vivo engraftment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…These differences in previous reports could arise from using different antibodies, tissue samples (cell lines vs. human tissue), methods of detection (IHC expression vs. PCR based techniques) [34], and tissue sampling method (tissue microarray vs. individually mounted tissue slides) and method for scoring the positivity of CD133 IHC expression. To avoid the scoring bias and in view of a recent paper in which CD133 positivity was quantitatively graded [35], we used four-tiered scoring method comprising 0 (totally negative cases), 1+, 2+, and 3+ cases (CD133+ cells covering 1-10%, 11-50%, and 51-100%, of the tumor area, respectively). Nevertheless, we considered the 2+ and 3+ groups as CD133 positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been hypothesized that CSCs play a role in tumor chemoresistance. They have also been termed cancer initiating cells as they retain the ability to form colonies, and are also responsible for tumor recurrence and refractoriness (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). It has been suggested that colorectal cancer is caused by an alteration in the normal homeostasis of stem cells (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%