2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.544222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantile Regression under Misspecification, with an Application to the U.S. Wage Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
148
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
148
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 2 introduces the GIC and DLC. The results of this paper are also related to those on inference on the quantile process; see, for example, Belloni et al (2011) and Qu and Yoon (2015) for the nonparametric case; Gutenbrunner and Jureckova (1992), Koenker and Machado (1999), Koenker and Xiao (2002), Chernozhukov and Fernandez-Val (2005), and Angrist et al (2006) for the parametric case. The empirical application to the USA and Brazil is presented in Section 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Section 2 introduces the GIC and DLC. The results of this paper are also related to those on inference on the quantile process; see, for example, Belloni et al (2011) and Qu and Yoon (2015) for the nonparametric case; Gutenbrunner and Jureckova (1992), Koenker and Machado (1999), Koenker and Xiao (2002), Chernozhukov and Fernandez-Val (2005), and Angrist et al (2006) for the parametric case. The empirical application to the USA and Brazil is presented in Section 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Assuming that the conditional density f Y ( y | x ) exists, we can follow the same procedure as given in Theorem 2 of Angrist et al (2006) and obtain the coefficient bjτ0 that is the minimizer of the weighted least squares: bjτ0=argminbjτREfalse[w˜τfalse(boldXfalse)·false(Qτfalse(Yfalse|boldXfalse)bjτXjfalse)2false], where w˜τfalse(boldXfalse)=1201fεfalse(u·Δτfalse(Xj,bjτ0false)false|boldXfalse)du, and Δτfalse(Xj,bjτ0false)=b0τ0+bjτ0XjQτfalse(Yfalse|boldXfalse) for j = 1, ⋯, p . As a result, bjτ0=false{Efalse(w˜τfalse(boldXfalse)Xj2false)false}1Efalse(w˜τfalse(boldXfalse)XjQτfalse(Yfalse|boldXfalse)false)=βjτ0+djτ, where djτ=kjβkτ0false{Efalse(w˜τfalse(boldXfalse)Xj2false)false}1Efalse(w˜τfalse(boldXfalse)XjXkfalse).…”
Section: Quantile Partial Correlation (Qpcor)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these models are not appropriate in this application due to substantial conditional heteroskedasticity in log wages (Lemieux (2006) and Angrist, Chernozhukov, and Fernández-Val (2006)). We consider the use of quantile regression, distribution regression, classical regression, and duration/transformation regression.…”
Section: Labor Market Institutions and The Distribution Of Wagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For applications, including to counterfactual analysis, see, for example,Buchinsky (1994),Chamberlain (1994),Abadie (1997),Gosling, Machin, and Meghir (2000),Machado and Mata (2005),Angrist, Chernozhukov, and Fernández-Val (2006), andAutor, Katz, and Kearney (2006b). For applications, including to counterfactual analysis, see, for example,Buchinsky (1994),Chamberlain (1994),Abadie (1997),Gosling, Machin, and Meghir (2000),Machado and Mata (2005),Angrist, Chernozhukov, and Fernández-Val (2006), andAutor, Katz, and Kearney (2006b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%