2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-016-1504-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantile-based optimization under uncertainties using adaptive Kriging surrogate models

Abstract: Uncertainties are inherent to real-world systems. Taking them into account is crucial in industrial design problems and this might be achieved through reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) techniques. In this paper, we propose a quantile-based approach to solve RBDO problems. We first transform the safety constraints usually formulated as admissible probabilities of failure into constraints on quantiles of the performance criteria. In this formulation, the quantile level controls the degree of conservat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Future works could also consider the adaptation of the proposed SoGP framework to task-oriented problems, such as solving optimization problems by Efficient Global Optimization strategies [49], or the simulation of rare events [50]. Such developments will require objective oriented active learning strategies to improve the SoGP predictive capabilities for the input values of interest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future works could also consider the adaptation of the proposed SoGP framework to task-oriented problems, such as solving optimization problems by Efficient Global Optimization strategies [49], or the simulation of rare events [50]. Such developments will require objective oriented active learning strategies to improve the SoGP predictive capabilities for the input values of interest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…kernels), being aware that only functions that yield symmetric positive semidefinite covariance matrices are valid choices [25]. The selection of the covariance function encodes assumptions such as the degree of regularity of the underlying process [31]. A general expression for the covariance between any pair of scalar input points x,x ∈ R ds is given by…”
Section: Gaussian Process Metamodeling Of Scalar-input Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a critical value u , K p samples are selected for the refinement of the performance function surrogate Ĝ. For each sample xRd, the so‐called probability of misclassification P m ( x ) is defined as Reference : Pmu(x)=φ|μĜ(x)u|σĜ(x). …”
Section: The Qeak‐mcs Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%