2008
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/3/034114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying DNA melting transitions using single-molecule force spectroscopy

Abstract: We stretched a DNA molecule using atomic force microscope and quantified the mechanical properties associated with B and S forms of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), molten DNA, and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). We also fit overdamped diffusion models to the AFM time series and used these models to extract additional kinetic information about the system. Our analysis provides additional evidence supporting the view that S-DNA is a stable intermediate encountered during dsDNA melting by mechanical force. In addition,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
133
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches are particularly sensitive to noise models, 61,86,9496 and for this reason, it is often best to simultaneously infer the model for the system of interest together with the noise model in a self-consistent fashion. The hidden Markov model that we describe in greater depth in section 3.4.1 is one such example.…”
Section: Data-driven Modeling: Key Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are particularly sensitive to noise models, 61,86,9496 and for this reason, it is often best to simultaneously infer the model for the system of interest together with the noise model in a self-consistent fashion. The hidden Markov model that we describe in greater depth in section 3.4.1 is one such example.…”
Section: Data-driven Modeling: Key Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA overstretching transition was originally observed on DNA with open ends (end-opened DNA), which is torsion-unconstrained (5,6). Since its discovery, three transitions have been debated to explain DNA overstretching (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) (Fig. 1): (i) "peeling" of one strand from the other to a peeled ssDNA strand under tension while the other ssDNA strand coils, (ii) "inside-strand separation" to two parallel ssDNA strands that share tension (melting bubbles), and (iii) "B-to-S" transition to a novel overstretched dsDNA, termed S-DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For end-opened DNA, two kinetically and thermodynamically distinct overstretching transitions have been reported (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), which can be selected by changing base-pair stability through temperature, salt concentration, and DNA sequence (8)(9)(10). One transition is the peeling transition to peeled ssDNA (8)(9)(10)18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulling events capturing multiple tip interactions or oligomers were excluded from data analysis by selecting curves with only one detachment peak and of extension length similar to a single perlecan monomer. The force curves were fitted with either the extensible WLC (eWLC) model [61,62] (for native perlecan with or without GAG), x=Lctrue[11true(4βLpFtrue)1/2+FKtrue], or inextensible WLC model [61,6365] (for denatured DTT treated perlecan), Ffalse(xfalse)=1Lpβtrue[14false(1x/Lcfalse)2+xLc14true], where x is the extension, F is the force, K is the elastic stretch modulus and β = 1/ k B T where k B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, L c is the contour length of the total end-to-end length of an extended molecule and L p is the persistence length. Histograms of the L c and L p distributions were fitted to a Gaussian curve to get statistical measures of the two parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%