2010
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Quantification of tear proteins by SDS-PAGE with an internal standard protein: A new method with special reference to small volume tears
Abstract: Using SBTI as an internal standard, we can simultaneously quantify total tear protein and the major tear protein components by SDS-PAGE densitometry using small volume tears. This method appears promising for use as a diagnostic tool for identifying the occurrence of ocular diseases with tear protein changes.
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
24
10
7
6
Citation Types
1
38
0
0
Year Published
Range
2010
20102026
2026Publication Types
Select...
37
3
2
1
Relationship
1
42
Authors
Journals
Cited by 43 publications
(39 citation statements)
References 33 publications
1
38
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 49%
“……”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 74%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 49%
“……”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 74%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Consistent with older reports in human subjects, the higher TPC in absorbent materials such as Schirmer strips vs. capillary tubes is presumably related to an increased in serum-derived proteins due to conjunctival irritation [ 7 , 17 ]. However, these findings are not consistent across the scientific literature as recent studies have described an equal [ 9 ] or inferior [ 18 ] amount of proteins in Schirmer-collected tears when compared to capillary tubes. Thus, it is likely inaccurate to compare the findings of various studies based on the tear collection method alone.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Here, we showed that Schirmer strips compared well with capillary glass tubes except for minor discrepancies such as serum albumin levels at a single time point (9 am) and TPC in eyes with moderate conjunctivitis. Similar comparisons yielded conflicting results in the human literature with either higher, 35 equal, 36 or inferior 37 amounts of proteins in Schirmer-collected tears when compared to capillary tubes. Further, disease state did not exacerbate differences between tear collection methods in canine eyes, in contrast to the hypothesis that Schirmer strips might capture larger protein amounts by causing micro-trauma to the hyperemic and more vulnerable conjunctiva.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 80%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 49%
“……”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 74%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Consistent with older reports in human subjects, the higher TPC in absorbent materials such as Schirmer strips vs. capillary tubes is presumably related to an increased in serum-derived proteins due to conjunctival irritation [ 7 , 17 ]. However, these findings are not consistent across the scientific literature as recent studies have described an equal [ 9 ] or inferior [ 18 ] amount of proteins in Schirmer-collected tears when compared to capillary tubes. Thus, it is likely inaccurate to compare the findings of various studies based on the tear collection method alone.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Here, we showed that Schirmer strips compared well with capillary glass tubes except for minor discrepancies such as serum albumin levels at a single time point (9 am) and TPC in eyes with moderate conjunctivitis. Similar comparisons yielded conflicting results in the human literature with either higher, 35 equal, 36 or inferior 37 amounts of proteins in Schirmer-collected tears when compared to capillary tubes. Further, disease state did not exacerbate differences between tear collection methods in canine eyes, in contrast to the hypothesis that Schirmer strips might capture larger protein amounts by causing micro-trauma to the hyperemic and more vulnerable conjunctiva.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 80%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 49%
“……”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 74%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Consistent with older reports in human subjects, the higher TPC in absorbent materials such as Schirmer strips vs. capillary tubes is presumably related to an increased in serum-derived proteins due to conjunctival irritation [ 7 , 17 ]. However, these findings are not consistent across the scientific literature as recent studies have described an equal [ 9 ] or inferior [ 18 ] amount of proteins in Schirmer-collected tears when compared to capillary tubes. Thus, it is likely inaccurate to compare the findings of various studies based on the tear collection method alone.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 63%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Here, we showed that Schirmer strips compared well with capillary glass tubes except for minor discrepancies such as serum albumin levels at a single time point (9 am) and TPC in eyes with moderate conjunctivitis. Similar comparisons yielded conflicting results in the human literature with either higher, 35 equal, 36 or inferior 37 amounts of proteins in Schirmer-collected tears when compared to capillary tubes. Further, disease state did not exacerbate differences between tear collection methods in canine eyes, in contrast to the hypothesis that Schirmer strips might capture larger protein amounts by causing micro-trauma to the hyperemic and more vulnerable conjunctiva.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 80%