2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2019.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of mitochondrial DNA damage and copy number in circulating blood of patients with systemic sclerosis by a qPCR-based assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that most studies on mtDNA copy number in diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction demonstrate a decrease in mtDNA copy number compared to healthy controls (Ding et al, 2023;Malik, 2023). The previous study on the number of mtDNA copies in the peripheral blood of patients with SSc showed that mtDNA copy number was lower in SSc patients in comparison with healthy participants of the study (Movassaghi et al, 2020). It can be assumed that the differences in mtDNA copy number between SSc and control groups in the current study did not reach statistical significance due to insufficient sample size, while the published study included 46 patients with SSc vs. 49 healthy individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is known that most studies on mtDNA copy number in diseases associated with mitochondrial dysfunction demonstrate a decrease in mtDNA copy number compared to healthy controls (Ding et al, 2023;Malik, 2023). The previous study on the number of mtDNA copies in the peripheral blood of patients with SSc showed that mtDNA copy number was lower in SSc patients in comparison with healthy participants of the study (Movassaghi et al, 2020). It can be assumed that the differences in mtDNA copy number between SSc and control groups in the current study did not reach statistical significance due to insufficient sample size, while the published study included 46 patients with SSc vs. 49 healthy individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“… 39 , 45 In addition, although mtDNAcn quantification has been used as a biomarker for mitochondrial function and has been implicated in age-related diseases, 46 it is not a direct measure of the functionality of individual mitochondria and may reflect oxidative stress states rather than cellular aging itself. 44 , 47 Indeed, mtDNAcn as measured by qPCR, which reflects the relative quantity of mitochondrial DNA compared to the nuclear DNA in a sample, should be considered a proxy for the content of mitochondrial copies. Mixed findings have been also reported with respect to the direction of altered mtDNAcn in several neuropsychiatric disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of mtDNA oxidative damage. 8-Hydroxyl 2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) is one of the most common markers of oxidative DNA lesions and is widely applied for the measurement of oxidative DNA damage (32,33). In the detection of oxidative damage with 8-OHdG, the marker does not deform the DNA structure but causes inhibition of Taq DNA polymerase during PCR.…”
Section: Mitochondrial Genome Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%