2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2196-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life of chronic myeloid leukemia patients in Brazil: ability to work as a key factor

Abstract: A recent change in medication can improve quality of life. The ability to work is an important component of quality of life of patients with CML. Ability to work should be specifically considered in CML treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is important because the ability to work was also associated with higher scores on the FACT-G (p<0.001) and the FACT-Leu (p<0.001). 28 …”
Section: Ability To Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because the ability to work was also associated with higher scores on the FACT-G (p<0.001) and the FACT-Leu (p<0.001). 28 …”
Section: Ability To Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data show the need for additional health information to promote a better understanding by patients of the importance of their adherence to treatment, as the disease requires daily and rigorous use of oral medication. On the other hand, the ability to work proved to be an essential component in the quality-of-life of CML patients 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a framework emphasizes identifying treatment approaches that restore patient function and consequently the economic value of therapy to the patient and society, thereby indirectly offsetting higher costs of treatment. Although not yet widely used to compare proton therapy versus IMRT, engaging studies through the lens of this framework would represent a patient-centered lens when comparing cost of illness, a lens that has already been applied for evaluating the value of systemic and targeted therapies for cancer of other disease sites [ 39 , 40 ]. Our research group, conducting the ongoing randomized trial of proton versus photon treatment for oropharyngeal cancer patients (NCT01893307) [ 41 ], is evaluating patients' work and productivity outcomes after chemoradiation as a secondary outcome.…”
Section: Addressing the Economic Impact Of Proton Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%