1990
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(90)90122-a
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Quality of life assessment during chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
11
1
1
0

Citation Types

0
4
0
0

Year Published

Range
1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
12
1

Relationship

0
13

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 13 publications

(4 citation statements)
references

References 5 publications

0
4
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In fact, attempts to measure quality of life encountered difficulty because of compliance problems [38,39] or were not undertaken [35,40]. Limited evaluation of quality of life failed to show any significant difference in one study [42], However, as shown also in our study, there can be considerable symptomatic relief even in the absence of objective responses [47], We conclude that the acceptable antitumor activity of 'FOM', combined with its very low toxicity, makes this regimen attrac tive for all patients in whom improvement of quality of life rather than response is the main goal of treatment. 'FOM' should be tested in a randomized trial versus current cisplatinand/or anthracycline-based combinations for advanced NSCLC, evaluating primarily quality of life and including a control arm with best supportive care.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…In most instances, this has been balanced by increas ed toxicity and a generally lower quality of life. Insufficient emphasis has been placed so far upon the evaluation of the patient's quality of life in addition to attempted benefits and toxic effects of chemotherapy [47]. In fact, attempts to measure quality of life encountered difficulty because of compliance problems [38,39] or were not undertaken [35,40].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation