2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Life After Early Mitral Valve Repair Using Conventional and Robotic Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible disadvantages and likely the reasons for the robotic approach not gaining widespread use are the complexity of procedure and the cost associated with greater initial investment, maintenance, disposable instruments and retrograde cardioplegia catheters. It has been suggested that this may be compensated for by the overall economic advantages of robotic approach, specifically shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and faster return to work (18,25).…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of Surgical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible disadvantages and likely the reasons for the robotic approach not gaining widespread use are the complexity of procedure and the cost associated with greater initial investment, maintenance, disposable instruments and retrograde cardioplegia catheters. It has been suggested that this may be compensated for by the overall economic advantages of robotic approach, specifically shorter hospital stay, faster recovery and faster return to work (18,25).…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of Surgical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the quality of life of patients after mitral valve surgery, we conducted a prospective study involving 202 consecutive patients who underwent robotic surgery or sternotomy (17). Using a range of recognized measurement tools such as the Duke Activity Status Index, the Short Form 12-Item Health Survey, and Single-item, Linear Analogue Self-Assessment scales, we found that robotic repair was associated with improved outcomes at one year.…”
Section: Cost and Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage of robotic surgery, especially in mitral valve surgery, is the demanding anatomy of this valve meaning that 3D vision is required during surgery [5]. It is claimed that robotic mitral valve repair allows complete anatomic correction of all categories of leaflet prolapse, offers excellent freedom from adverse events, decreases ventilation time and length of stay, and has been shown to improve quality of life [5,6]. On the other hand, trials such as EVEREST I and II that compared the benefits and risks of percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip device (Evalve, Inc., CA, USA) compared with open mitral valve surgery were initiated to offer another less invasive solution to mitral valve disease that may be more attractive to patients compared with robotic mitral valve repair [7], which is still considered 'surgery'.…”
Section: Future Cardiology Part Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%