2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of audio-assisted versus video-assisted dispatcher-instructed bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
1
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
65
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, this may be complemented by videoassisted dispatching, as has been trialed by GoodSAM [28]. While this implementation focused on the remote initial assessment of trauma, studies have shown that video-assisted dispatching may improve the quality of DACPR provided compared to the current, audioinstructed method [29].…”
Section: Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this may be complemented by videoassisted dispatching, as has been trialed by GoodSAM [28]. While this implementation focused on the remote initial assessment of trauma, studies have shown that video-assisted dispatching may improve the quality of DACPR provided compared to the current, audioinstructed method [29].…”
Section: Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study showed that real-time, audiovisual feedback using a smartphone application and webbased system in combination with dispatcher instructions Open access to the CC rate and hand position. [22][23][24][25][26] In a recent study that compared the real-world effects of video-instructed or audio-instructed T-CPR on the resuscitation outcomes, video-instructed T-CPR caused no delay in initiating CC although it was not associated with improvement in the survival rates. 27 In dispatch-assisted instructions, the smartphone has secured a role as a promising carrier to improve video resuscitation care with its wide availability and high communication capabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomisation was stratified by age groups (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) and 55-65 years) and conducted to ensure equal distribution of participants across study arms. Participants were randomised into either the control arm (conventional T-CPR group) or interventional arm (T-CPR with the TCPRLink group).…”
Section: Randomisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such tools have shown to be effective in improving the quality of compressions [ 22 - 25 ]. Several tools have been conceived to guide bystanders’ management of out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) through audio/video support by means of mobile phones [ 26 ]. Augmented reality glasses have also been studied to communicate with a remote intensivist to support the management of in-hospital PCA [ 27 ] or to display Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) guidelines to the team leader during a PCA scenario [ 28 ] with partial benefit in improving resuscitation performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%