2019 7th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/conisoft.2019.00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Metrics in Software Design: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [35], the design metrics found after performing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) are presented. The authors mention that the metrics mainly measure the classes modeled in Unified Modeling Language (UML), with their respective attributes and methods, plus other aspects such as encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, cohesion, or coupling between classes were measured.…”
Section: Design Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [35], the design metrics found after performing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) are presented. The authors mention that the metrics mainly measure the classes modeled in Unified Modeling Language (UML), with their respective attributes and methods, plus other aspects such as encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, cohesion, or coupling between classes were measured.…”
Section: Design Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors mention that the metrics mainly measure the classes modeled in Unified Modeling Language (UML), with their respective attributes and methods, plus other aspects such as encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, cohesion, or coupling between classes were measured. The selected metrics used in this work are those identified in [35], which are a selection of the metrics of Chidamber and Kemerer, Lorenz and Kidd, Abreu and Melo, and unknown authors, as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Design Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%