Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.

Murphy, .; Dingwall,; Greatbatch,; Parker,; Watson, J. R.

doi:10.3310/hta2160

Cited by 649 publications

(593 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

583

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Further, we restricted eligibility to initial encounters with SDMs to limit carry-over effects and obtained high questionnaire response rates which enhance the generalizability of our findings. Our qualitative study was guided by a well-defined research question, conducted using rigorous methodology and adhered to recognized tenets of qualitative research [34,35]. Our study also has limitations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study)

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study)

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The trustworthiness of the final analysis itself is grounded in the reflexivity of the investigators, an interactive process of thinking and dialoging, and made explicit through the documentation of personal ideas and reactions to the text as we read it as well as through the detailed notes made for each of the team meetings. Member checking, or the practice of returning to the participants of a study to validate the researchers' taxonomies and adequacy of analysis (Murphy et al 1998), was also utilized in this project. At the final focus group session with each cultural group, the themes and sub-themes arising from the transcripts of that group were presented to participants.…”

Section: Analysis and Rigormentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Identity and Experiences of Prejudice and Discrimination of Afghan and Iranian Immigrant Youth

Khanlou

Koh

Mill

2008

Int J Ment Health Addiction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In culturally diverse and immigrant receiving societies, immigrant youth can be subject to prejudice and discrimination. Such experiences can impact on immigrant youth's cultural identity and influence their psychosocial outcomes. This paper presents findings of a study that examined cultural identity and experiences of prejudice and discrimination among Afghan (N=9) and Iranian (N=17) immigrant youth in Canada. The study had a prospective, comparative, longitudinal qualitative design. Data was gathered through focus groups, interviews, journals and field logs. Four main themes emerged on participants' experiences of prejudice and discrimination: (a) societal factors influencing prejudice; (b) personal experiences of discrimination; (c) fear of disclosure and silenced cultural identity; and (d) resiliency and strength of cultural identity. Drawing from Rosenberg's (Conceiving the self, Basic Books, New York, 1979) self-concept framework and Romero and Roberts (J. Adolesc., 21:641-656, 1998) distinction between prejudice and discrimination, results indicated that youth's extant and presenting cultural identity were affected. Inclusive policies and practices are needed to promote youth integration in multicultural and immigrant receiving settings.Prejudice and discrimination in post-migration contexts can impact on the cultural identity of immigrant youth. Such experiences can also shape the settlement, integration and sense of belonging of newcomer youth. Different immigrant groups can experience varying degrees of prejudice and discrimination in their countries of settlement, which often are influenced by broader historical and contextual factors, that can ultimately influence their cultural identity and acculturation process (Jasinskaja-Lahti et al. 2003;Phinney et al. 2001Phinney et al. , 2006. Adolescent attitudes towards the larger society can range in strength from a positive sense of belonging to feelings of exclusion (

show abstract

“…Assessing the answer's validity in the face of conflicting evidence 6. Conclusion Source: Adapted from Huth 2009, p. 251 It has been discussed that that validity and relevance might be always consider as key criteria in selecting papers (Murphy et al 1998) and Brannen (1992) pointed out that quality criteria are different in different methodologies-qualitative and quantitative approaches, but the general quality criteria are often overlapped. Therefore Mays et al (2005) argue that the 'criteria to assess quantitative and qualitative research for synthesis is determining which approaches should be used and how the criteria should be applied' (p. 11).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Ethical and Legal Issues in Publication and Dissemination of Scholarly Knowledge: A Summary of the Published Evidence

Regmi

2011

J Acad Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research publication and dissemination of scholarly knowledge in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are among the most influential roles of many academic scholars in both industrialised and developing nations, but such experience and skills are rarely taught, transferred and shared in the real world. Dealing with issues of research misconduct might be challenging as well as learning opportunities for new academics while conducting research and scholarship teaching and publication in HEIs. In this review paper, I will discuss some concepts of research misconduct, highlighting some relevant ethical and legal concerns in publication. This paper concludes that continued education and support on ethical research to graduates and scholars might help to prevent research misconduct related to publications and dissemination through developing appropriate strategies in practice.

show abstract

Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.

Cited by 649 publications

References 0 publications

Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study)

Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study)

Cultural Identity and Experiences of Prejudice and Discrimination of Afghan and Iranian Immigrant Youth

Ethical and Legal Issues in Publication and Dissemination of Scholarly Knowledge: A Summary of the Published Evidence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About