2008 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision 2008
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2008.4544008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Assessment of Video Stabilization and Mosaicking Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu et al [6] suggested an empirical process that assumes that if the more energy is in the low-frequency part of a video, the video will be more stable. We see that most existing proposed metrics [1,2,21,25,26] for VS approaches are either synthetically shaking video-based or heuristic approaches [2,6,24,27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Liu et al [6] suggested an empirical process that assumes that if the more energy is in the low-frequency part of a video, the video will be more stable. We see that most existing proposed metrics [1,2,21,25,26] for VS approaches are either synthetically shaking video-based or heuristic approaches [2,6,24,27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Qu et al [25] tested their proposed method based on synthetically shaking video to measure the accuracy of the three stabilization algorithms of Deshaker, Grundmann, and Qu. Zhang et al [1] assessed the stability of intensity-based video stabilization and featurebased video stabilization. From the ground truth motion and the estimated motion, the researchers computed a mean square error (MSE) between consecutive frames and root mean square (RMS) error for the whole sequences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ITF is the PSNR between two consecutive stabilized frames in the cases without ground-truth videos, while GTF is the PSNR between the ground-truth frame and the current stabilized frame. Zhang et al [4] proposed some performance metrics for electronic stabilization, such as accuracy, capture range, tolerance, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offiah et al [5] proposed a subjective Mean Opinion Score (MOS) metric by extending Zhang et al's work [4]. They evaluated the performance of four stabilization algorithms in endoscopy by comparing the stabilized videos to the synthetic reference version based on both the objective and subjective metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%