1964
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.1964.tb01260.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quaker Employers and Industrial Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It stemmed from a growing realization that sooner rather than later the company would need to come to grips with what McCarthy and Ellis (1973) have termed the 'challenges from within and without'. The traditions of welfare paternalism associated with Quaker employers such as Cadbury Ltd (Child, 1964) were increasingly questioned as to their appropriateness for the changed circumstances of the 1960s.…”
Section: T H E Corporate Context: T H E Decision To Relocatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It stemmed from a growing realization that sooner rather than later the company would need to come to grips with what McCarthy and Ellis (1973) have termed the 'challenges from within and without'. The traditions of welfare paternalism associated with Quaker employers such as Cadbury Ltd (Child, 1964) were increasingly questioned as to their appropriateness for the changed circumstances of the 1960s.…”
Section: T H E Corporate Context: T H E Decision To Relocatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devoutness was no guarantee of philanthropy. 50 Indeed, it was the professional managers like Bartholomew and Paton, who increasingly took over the running of the firm, that were responsible for making Bryant and May a welfarist employer. In contrast to Wilberforce Bryant, who acknowledged only his duty to shareholders,5' Paton argued that the rights to profits had to be balanced alongside the interests of workers.…”
Section: Labour and Business In Modern Britainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the managers of the Body Shop, Shell, or Café Direct have different experiences regarding the feasibility of moral agency under conditions of competitive market ordering than did Quaker managers or other early factory managers (Wagner-Tsukamoto, 2001b, forthcoming; see also Child, 1964;Taylor, 1964). Hence, the conventional economic view that corporate moral agency can only come as unintentional agency or at best as passive, intentional agency needs certain revisions.…”
Section: Revisions To the Classical /Neo-classical And Institutimentioning
confidence: 99%