2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(02)01185-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCD at moderately large distances

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If α s (Q 2 ) is larger than α max s = 1.0 it is set to α max s . This cutoff procedure is in line with a soft average of α s given by the universality hypothesis [37,43]. We checked that our results of the energy loss are not very sensitive on the exact value of Λ or α max s since the contribution from the soft part of the process is very small.…”
Section: Modification Of the Cross Sectionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…If α s (Q 2 ) is larger than α max s = 1.0 it is set to α max s . This cutoff procedure is in line with a soft average of α s given by the universality hypothesis [37,43]. We checked that our results of the energy loss are not very sensitive on the exact value of Λ or α max s since the contribution from the soft part of the process is very small.…”
Section: Modification Of the Cross Sectionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The same is valid for the analyticity which is relevant for the scattering amplitudes of the observable particles only. As it was noted in [1], it is not clear what these fundamental principles imply for the confined objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…is running and constrained by the sum rule advanced by Dokshitzer [24]. Both these improvements increased the cross section especially for small momentum transfers and reduced therefore the necessary K (used in our previous work [5]) factor to 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%