2018
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pyHVis3D: visualising molecular simulation deduced H-bond networks in 3D: application to T-cell receptor interactions

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally we chose the A6, JM22, and 1G4 systems as they have been investigated computationally before (e.g. [14,15,18,27]) and all three TCRs bind to HLA-A*02:01 while the LC13 TCR binds HLA-B*08:01. This allows us to investigate if there are conserved TCR reaction features across MHC types as well as within HLA-A*02:01.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally we chose the A6, JM22, and 1G4 systems as they have been investigated computationally before (e.g. [14,15,18,27]) and all three TCRs bind to HLA-A*02:01 while the LC13 TCR binds HLA-B*08:01. This allows us to investigate if there are conserved TCR reaction features across MHC types as well as within HLA-A*02:01.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final production runs were carried out using Gromacs 4 [28] and the GROMOS 53a6 force field [30]. Parts of the LC13 simulations were taken from our previous work in [21] and [23] while parts of the A6, JM22, and 1G4 simulations were taken from [14] and [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the cognate peptide, MHC and TCR structures in the aforementioned database, there have been a number of attempts to accurately predict peptide-MHC conformations, including docking algorithms (140,141), protein threading (142), all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (143)(144)(145), energy minimization (146) and hybrid of these approaches (147). Likewise, approaches to model pMHC-TCR include MD or Monte Carlo simulations, TCR:pMHC hydrogen bond network analysis (148,149), binding free energy simulation (150) and CDR loop characterization (130). Both rigid and flexible docking protocols have been proposed to assemble unbound structures (151).…”
Section: Features From Structural Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, by correlating average feature values with MSM eigenvectors along micro-state (Pérez-Hernández et al , 2013), one can thus extract features that represent best the slowest eigenvectors of an MSM. Alternatively, one can identify significant feature differences (SFDs) among pairs of simulated ensembles—e.g., meta-stable states (sets) of micro-states, even across different mutants—as implemented for non-covalent contact frequencies in (Farabella et al , 2014), or in the PIA (Stolzenberg, 2014; Stolzenberg et al , 2015, 2016), and pyHVis3D (Knapp et al , 2018) tools. In this paper, I have developed the object-oriented Python package PySFD (Significant Feature Differences analyzer for Python), a generalized and more powerful framework that efficiently detects and visualizes significant differences in any user-defined feature between many pairs or many groups of molecular simulation state ensembles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%