Puzzle-based versus traditional lecture: comparing the effects of pedagogy on academic performance in an undergraduate human anatomy and physiology II lab

Abstract

BackgroundA traditional lecture-based pedagogy conveys information and content while lacking sufficient development of critical thinking skills and problem solving. A puzzle-based pedagogy creates a broader contextual framework, and fosters critical thinking as well as logical reasoning skills that can then be used to improve a student’s performance on content specific assessments. This paper describes a pedagogical comparison of traditional lecture-based teaching and puzzle-based teaching in a Human Anatomy and Physiology II Lab.MethodsUsing a single subject/cross-over design half of the students from seven sections of the course were taught using one type of pedagogy for the first half of the semester, and then taught with a different pedagogy for the second half of the semester. The other half of the students were taught the same material but with the order of the pedagogies reversed. Students’ performance on quizzes and exams specific to the course, and in-class assignments specific to this study were assessed for: learning outcomes (the ability to form the correct conclusion or recall specific information), and authentic academic performance as described by (Am J Educ 104:280–312, 1996).ResultsOur findings suggest a significant improvement in students’ performance on standard course specific assessments using a puzzle-based pedagogy versus a traditional lecture-based teaching style. Quiz and test scores for students improved by 2.1 and 0.4 % respectively in the puzzle-based pedagogy, versus the traditional lecture-based teaching. Additionally, the assessments of authentic academic performance may only effectively measure a broader conceptual understanding in a limited set of contexts, and not in the context of a Human Anatomy and Physiology II Lab.ConclusionIn conclusion, a puzzle-based pedagogy, when compared to traditional lecture-based teaching, can effectively enhance the performance of students on standard course specific assessments, even when the assessments only test a limited conceptual understanding of the material.

Self-directed learning can outperform direct instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results of a mixed methods trial

“…Finding the ideal form to provide students with sustainable knowledge is the subject of several different studies. Although there are many studies comparing two or more instruction forms [2–4], there are no studies that compare traditional teaching methods to self-directed learning within the course of a modern medical curriculum.…”

Web-Based Immersive Virtual Patient Simulators: Positive Effect on Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education

“…This is also supported by other studies for different validity levels [ 18 , 23 ]. As these assessments are often focused on a specific part of procedural knowledge [ 24 ], we also measured knowledge gain in terms of declarative knowledge. The comparison of pre- and posttest performance revealed an increase in declarative knowledge.…”

3D Dentobox (Dental Explosion Box 3D) as education media for children caries prevention

“…Inside this box were educational puzzle games, quizzes created a unique, thus stimulating the activity of the child, so that the educational material can be easily remembered and applied by children. 7 Pratiwi et al 8 conducted a study on the influence of educational game methods and lecture methods on knowledge, attitudes, and actions about diarrheal disease in elementary school children in Kendari and found that educative game methods were more effective in changing knowledge, attitudes, and actions. This was because the accuracy of the election of the extension methods used in the experimental group matched the characteristics of respondents, i.e.…”