Purposive Teaching Styles for Transdisciplinary AEC Education: A Diagnostic Learning Styles Questionnaire

Khuzzan, Sharifah Mazlina Syed; Goulding, Jack Steven; Rahimian, Farzad Pour

doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i2.669

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 44 publications

(45 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Learners are also involved in their own learning by acquiring knowledge through a real-life experience which is a great way to transfer their already known knowledge right into the situation (Steakley, 2008). Students construct conceptive ground in order to study with further disciplines in a welldesigned multidisciplinary learning environment (Khuzzan & Goulding & Rahimian, 2015). One of the most mentioned advantages of using constructivism in the articles is to form a new knowledge which is a way to help the learner feel that he/she is one of the members of this world and a part of earth's history (Jaleel & Verghis, 2015).…”

Section: What Are the Advantages Of Using A Constructivist Approach In Multidisciplinary Learning Environments?mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review: Constructivism in Multidisciplinary Learning Environments

Kara

2018

International Journal of Academic Research in Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study represents a review of literature on constructivism used in multidisciplinary learning environments which is to uncover the usage rate of constructivism in multidisciplinary environments and to be a guide to those who are seeking further knowledge about this topic in the future. Aspects like publication date and learner categories were taken into consideration during the research. It includes the definition of constructivism, the usage progress of constructivism in the classroom through the years, the best age range which can easily adapt the constructivist approach, types of activities, and the advantages and disadvantages of the approach in the multidisciplinary classroom. 64 articles were surveyed and 30 articles were selected to analyze. The data obtained showed that there is a significant increase in using a constructivist approach in every kind of classroom. However, some of the articles revealed that there are also a small number of disadvantages, too.

show abstract

Section: What Are the Advantages Of Using A Constructivist Approach In Multidisciplinary Learning Environments?mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review: Constructivism in Multidisciplinary Learning Environments

Kara

2018

International Journal of Academic Research in Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The convergence of these dependencies directly influences pedagogical effectiveness. Validating their argument they maintain that such a framework can enable better augmentation of organizations and educational institutions of their strategic priorities and learnerspecific qualities (Khuzzan, Goulding, and Pour Rahimian, 2015).…”

Section: Archnet-ijar In 2015mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Decade of Architectural and Urban Research Published in ‘Archnet-Ijar: International Journal of Architectural Research’

Salama¹,

Remali²,

Rahimian³

2017

ArchNet-IJAR

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The convergence of these dependencies directly influences pedagogical effectiveness. Validating their argument they maintain that such a framework can enable better augmentation of organizations and educational institutions of their strategic priorities and learner-specific qualities (Khuzzan, Goulding, and Pour Rahimian, 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial: Advancing the Debate on Architecture, Planning, and Built Environment Research

Salama

2015

ArchNet-IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With an acceptance rate that does not exceed 25% of the total papers and articles submitted to the journal, IJAR – International Journal of Architectural Research is moving forward to position itself among the leading journals in architecture and urban studies worldwide. As this is the case since the beginning of volume 5, issue 1, March 2011, one must note that the journal has been covered by several data and index bases since its inception including Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO-Current Abstracts-Art and Architecture, INTUTE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier and many university library databases across the globe. This is coupled with IJAR being an integral part of the archives and a featured collection of ArchNet and the Aga Khan Documentation Centre at MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.In 2014, IJAR was included in Quartile 2 / Q2 list of Journals both in ‘Architecture’ and ‘Urban Studies.’ As of May 2015, IJAR is ranked 23 out of 83 journals in ‘Architecture’ and 59 out of 119 in ‘Urban Studies.’ Rankings are based on the SJR (SCImago Journal Ranking); an Elsevier- SCOPUS indicator that measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of scholarly journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from. See here for more information (http://www.scimagojr.com/index.php) and (http://www.journalmetrics.com/sjr.php). While the journal is now on top of many of the distinguished journals in Elsevier- SCOPUS database, we will keep aspiring to sustain our position and move forward to Q1 group list and eventually in the top 10 journal list in the field. However, this requires sustained efforts and conscious endeavours that give attention to quality submissions through a rigorous review process. This edition of IJAR: volume 9, issue 2, July 2015 includes debates on a wide spectrum of issues, explorations and investigations in various settings. The issue encompasses sixteen papers addressing cities, settlements, and projects in Europe, South East Asia, and the Middle East. Papers involve international collaborations evidenced by joint contributions and come from scholars in universities, academic institutions, and practices in Belgium; Egypt; Greece; Italy; Jordan; Malaysia; Palestine; Qatar; Saudi Arabia; Serbia; Spain; Turkey; and the United Kingdom. In this editorial I briefly outline the key issues presented in these papers, which include topics relevant to social housing, multigenerational dwelling, practice-based research, sustainable design and biomimetic models, learning environments and learning styles, realism and the post modern condition, development and planning, urban identity, contemporary landscapes, and cultural values and traditions.

show abstract

Purposive Teaching Styles for Transdisciplinary AEC Education: A Diagnostic Learning Styles Questionnaire

Abstract: Acknowledging the progressive globalisation trend within the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC)

Cited by 4 publications

References 44 publications

A Systematic Literature Review: Constructivism in Multidisciplinary Learning Environments

A Systematic Literature Review: Constructivism in Multidisciplinary Learning Environments

A Decade of Architectural and Urban Research Published in ‘Archnet-Ijar: International Journal of Architectural Research’

Editorial: Advancing the Debate on Architecture, Planning, and Built Environment Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About