1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2540160.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification, characterization and cloning of an aspartic proteinase inhibitor from squash phloem exudate

Abstract: Phloem exudate from squash fruit contains heat-inactivated material which inhibits pepsin activity. This inhibitory activity was purified by mild acid treatment, chromatography on trypsin-agarose, Sephadex G-75 and reverse-phase HPLC, resulting in the elution of three peaks with pepsin-inhibitory activity. N-terminal sequencing indicated a common sequence of MGPGPAIGEVIG and the presence of minor species with seven-or two-amino-acid N-terminal extensions beyond this point. Microheterogeneity in this end sequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…That this inhibitor preparation was equal in effectiveness to that of pepstatin A, which inhibits pepsin as well as cathepsin D, suggests that cathepsin D is the major aspartyl proteinase in the extract. This conclusion is strengthened by the fact that a preparation of squash aspartic proteinase inhibitor (SQAPI), which inhibits pepsin but not cathepsin D (Christeller et al, 1998), had no effect on the extract (data not shown). Whether PDI will be useful in transgenic applications will hinge in large part on the effectiveness of the individual isoforms, as expressed from their cDNAs, on proteolytic activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That this inhibitor preparation was equal in effectiveness to that of pepstatin A, which inhibits pepsin as well as cathepsin D, suggests that cathepsin D is the major aspartyl proteinase in the extract. This conclusion is strengthened by the fact that a preparation of squash aspartic proteinase inhibitor (SQAPI), which inhibits pepsin but not cathepsin D (Christeller et al, 1998), had no effect on the extract (data not shown). Whether PDI will be useful in transgenic applications will hinge in large part on the effectiveness of the individual isoforms, as expressed from their cDNAs, on proteolytic activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of PIs to interfere with insect growth and development has been attributed to their capacity to bind to, and thereby inhibit the action of insect digestive proteinases (reviewed by Jongsma and Bolter, 1997). Since there exists significant variation among the types and properties of endo-and exo-proteinases utilized by insects for dietary purposes (reviewed by Terra and Ferreira, 1994), and because numerous PIs of widely-ranging specificities (Keilova and Tomasek, 1976a;Abe et al, 1994;Brzin et al, 1998;Christeller et al, 1998;Pernas et al, 1998) towards these proteinases are available, it is necessary to characterize the gut proteolytic activities of each individual species in order to devise a rational insect control strategy utilizing PIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to this broad distribution of the Ser PIN family, proteinaceous inhibitors of aspartic proteinases are less numerous and have been described in only a few plant species: potato Tomasek, 1976a, 1976b), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum; Werner et al, 1993), wheat (Triticum aestivum; Galleschi et al, 1993), Vicia sativa (Roszkowska-Jakimiec and Bankowska, 1998), Anchusa strigosa (Abuereish, 1998), and squash (Cucurbita pepo; Christeller et al, 1998). The biochemical characterization of the potato and V. sativa members showed that they were both cathepsin D inhibitors (CDIs), whereas the proteins from A. strigosa and squash inhibit pepsin, a digestive aspartic proteinase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lished that phloem PIs (3-10 kDa) are able to inhibit a wide range of proteinases (18,21,22), including a number of such enzymes extracted from the midgut of lepidopteran (chewing) larvae (23,24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%