2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification and characterization of trypsin from Luphiosilurus alexandri pyloric cecum

Abstract: Trypsin from L. alexandri was purified using only two purification processes: ammonium sulfate precipitation and anion exchange liquid chromatography in DEAE-Sepharose. Trypsin mass was estimated as 24 kDa through SDS-PAGE, which showed only one band in silver staining. The purified enzyme showed an optimum temperature and pH of 50 °C and 9.0, respectively. Stability was well maintained, with high levels of activity at a pH of up to 11.0, including high stability at a temperature of up to 50 °C after 60 min of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enzyme activity was lower than the trypsin isolated from sardine and catfish oil. The trypsin isolated from viscera of oil sardine had an activity of 2.28 U/mg [27], while the trypsin isolated from the pyloric caeca catfish had an activity of 2.09 U/mg [22]. This difference is caused by the type of fish and the internal organs of the fish used.…”
Section: Trypsin Activity Crude Extract and Trypsin Powder Without Mi...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The enzyme activity was lower than the trypsin isolated from sardine and catfish oil. The trypsin isolated from viscera of oil sardine had an activity of 2.28 U/mg [27], while the trypsin isolated from the pyloric caeca catfish had an activity of 2.09 U/mg [22]. This difference is caused by the type of fish and the internal organs of the fish used.…”
Section: Trypsin Activity Crude Extract and Trypsin Powder Without Mi...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…ε The calculations of each activity were carried out using the molar extinction coefficients. Protease activity was calculated using the molar extinction coefficient at λ = 410 nm by Ƹ = 8.8 mM −1 cm −1 [ 26 ]; esterase activity at λ = 410 nm by ε = 18.5 mM −1 cm −1 [ 27 ]; lipase activity by λ = 400 nm ε = 14.8 mM −1 cm −1 [ 13 ], and laccase activity at λ = 420 nm by ε = 36 mM −1 cm −1 [ 25 ]. All the activities were expressed in µM −1 g −1 min −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculations of each one of the activities were carried out using the molar extinction coefficients. Protease activity was calculated using the molar extinction coefficient at λ=410nm Ƹ= 8.8 mM -1 cm -1 [26]; esterase activity at λ=410nm by Ƹ= 18.5 mM -1 cm -1 [27]; lipase activity by λ=400nm Ƹ= 14.8 mM -1 cm -1 [13] and laccase activity at λ=420nm by Ƹ= 36 mM -1 cm -1 [25]. All activities were expressed in µM -1 g -1 min -1 .…”
Section: Enzyme Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%