Punching Above Their Weight Through Policy Learning: Tobacco Control Policies in Ireland

Abstract

Abstract:Ireland's tobacco control policy today is recognised as one of the strongest in Europe and the world, largely on the basis of its first-in-the world general workplace smoking ban in 2004. However, it is insufficiently recognised that Ireland has persistently and deliberately developed tobacco control policies since the 1970s, a longer period than most countries. Using a five-fold analysis of factors influencing tobacco policy agendas, socioeconomic setting (including public opinion), networks, institutions, and ideas (including scientific information and diffusion), this paper explains policy development in Ireland over the long term. It demonstrates how a small country, not dependent on tobacco growing or a domestic tobacco industry but also having only a small research and bureaucratic capacity, has managed to create a strong tobacco control policy. Even though it is an EU member, Ireland has utilised diffusion of research and policy in the English-speaking world, especially paying close attention to the United States, to develop its position as a world policy leader in tobacco control.

Multilevel governance, public health and the regulation of food: is tobacco control policy a model?

“…Scientific support for the general statement that poor diet is the largest contributor to NCDs has only reinforced patchy adoption of global measures, whose effect is relatively difficult to measure [30]. Some countries and the EU have taken some steps to address 'lifestyle' problems at an individual level, but there has not been a concerted effort at policy change to regulate population-wide behaviour [38].…”

Tobacco Control Policy in the Netherlands

“…According to , "the approaches are not rivals; they can complement each other and be part of the explanation" (p. 14). Instead of selecting the most suitable theory for each policy problem or using multiple theories and determining which describes the data and the observations best, my book follows an approach advocated by Donley Studlar and Paul Cairney (Cairney, 2007;Studlar, , 2015, who identified the core constructs from diverse theories that complement each other. They assumed that much might be gained from looking at the same policy case several times, each time from a different perspective and applying a different analytical lens.…”

Smoke screen? The globalization of production, transnational lobbying and the international political economy of plain tobacco packaging

“…The widespread interest in the PP challenge is directly related to its capacity to create ‘regulatory chill’ elsewhere (Fooks and Gilmore, 2013). Both New Zealand and the UK were actively considering similar legislation when Australia passed theirs (Mitchell and Wurzberger, 2011), while Ireland subsequently launched similar proposals, following close contact with the Australian administration (Studlar 2015). As the case unfolded and further to heavy lobbying by the industry detailed in Peeters et al (2013), the European Commission in Brussels decided not to include PP requirements in the revision of the Tobacco Products Directive, which would have applied throughout the EU 3 .…”