1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0534(1997)9:5<299::aid-cmr2>3.3.co;2-2
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Pulsed‐field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance as a tool for studying translational diffusion: Part 1. Basic theory

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
592
107
76
44

Citation Types

3
470
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
695
39
28
3

Relationship

23
742

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 765 publications

(476 citation statements)
references

References 85 publications

3
470
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Plots show that the signal for a=2 µm (left) flattens out almost instantaneously, while for a=10 µm (right) it flattens after about 17 ms. These results are consistent with previous studies of signal from the restricted compartment as a function of diffusion time . The flattening corresponds to the root mean squared displacement of free diffusion approaching the pore size, i.e., 2(δ+Δ0)D||a.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Plots show that the signal for a=2 µm (left) flattens out almost instantaneously, while for a=10 µm (right) it flattens after about 17 ms. These results are consistent with previous studies of signal from the restricted compartment as a function of diffusion time . The flattening corresponds to the root mean squared displacement of free diffusion approaching the pore size, i.e., 2(δ+Δ0)D||a.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…That 5 adapts a comparable structure in solution was demonstrated by diffusivity measurements. Pulsed field gradient spin echo (PSG‐SE) NMR experiments in CD 3 OD containing 0.4 % CF 3 CO 2 D provided a diffusion rate D =(2.28±0.09)×10 −6 cm 2 s −1 20. Application of the Stokes–Einstein equation yields a solvodynamic diameter of 3.2 nm, which is consistent with estimates from molecular models.…”
Section: Methods
supporting
confidence: 76%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…The ionic liquids were filled into 5 mm NMR tubes, which were sealed. The self-diffusion coefficients D were measured by means of the pulsed gradient stimulated echo (PGSTE technique). , In this technique, the echo signal I is given by I ( τ , T M , G ) = 1 2 I 0 exp true[ true( 2 τ T 2 true) true( T M T 1 true) true] exp true( γ 2 G 2 δ 2 D true( Δ δ 3 true) true) Here, τ and T M denote the time between the first and the second and between the second and the third 90° pulse, respectively, while T 1 and T 2 are the spin−lattice and spin−spin relaxation times, respectively. G denotes the magnetic field gradient, Δ is the diffusion time, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, and δ is the duration of the gradient pulse.…”
Section: Methods
contrasting
confidence: 75%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.