2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60753-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants (PulseOx): a test accuracy study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
284
7
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
17
284
7
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Andrew K Ewer et al screened more than 20,000 new born, and false position was 169 or (0.8%). In our study there were only 4 cases of false positive screen (3) . Frank Thomas Riede et al screened more than 40,000 babies and had 40 false-positive screen of which 12 were healthy, 15 had pulmonary hypertension of newborn and 13 had sepsis (4) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Andrew K Ewer et al screened more than 20,000 new born, and false position was 169 or (0.8%). In our study there were only 4 cases of false positive screen (3) . Frank Thomas Riede et al screened more than 40,000 babies and had 40 false-positive screen of which 12 were healthy, 15 had pulmonary hypertension of newborn and 13 had sepsis (4) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…None of the studies reviewed by the SACHDNC included receiver operator characteristic curves developed from primary data, which would allow a direct evaluation of this trade-off. However, on the basis of new data from the large population-based screening activities in Sweden 8 and England, 14 the work group developed a recommendation for screening that was based on what was shown to be effective in those studies.…”
Section: Screening Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,14 Repeated pulse-oximetry testing after an initial positive screen result if oxygen saturation is Ͻ95% in both extremities or there is a Ͼ3% absolute difference in oxygen saturation between the right hand and foot, as illustrated in the protocol, lowers the likelihood of a falsepositive result compared with a single measurement. However, there is no need to repeat pulse-oximetry testing if the oxygen saturation is Ͻ90% in any screen.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, several investigators evaluated the use of routine pulse oximetry to identify infants with CCHD before discharge from delivery units and reported on its validity. 8,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In the United States, many state legislatures have mandated universal pulse oximetry screening of newborns, which was endorsed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in 2011. The scientific committees of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association recommended that additional studies be conducted in large diverse populations across a broad range of delivery systems to determine whether pulse oximetry screening in neonates improves outcomes in infants with CCHD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%