2017
DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulse-Dose Radiofrequency in Athletic Pubalgia: Preliminary Results

Abstract: PDRF is an effective and safe technique in management of chronic pubalgia in athletes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63/65 (97%) at 10 weeks; 65/65 (100%) at 2 yearsLloyd et al 2008 [13]Retrospective cohort study (with prospective questionnaire)Level IVStudy population: 48 participants (37/48 (77%) were amateur athletes and 11/48 (23%) were manual labourers)Age: median age 38.5 years (min–max range 24–71 years)Gender: 42/48 (87.5%) maleClinical presentation: median duration of pain 18 months; participants with pain > 8 weeks and refractory to conservative management; all participants had localised tenderness over the inguinal ligament and superficial inguinal ringLaparoscopic TAPP repair with inguinal ligament tenotomyPain: pain severity pre-operative 7 to post-operative 3 ( p  < 0.0001); pain frequency score pre-operative 3 to post-operative 1 ( p  = 0.0012)Return to play: of 28/48 (58.3%) who returned questionnaires, 26/28 (92%) returned to normal sporting activity, although time period was not stated; return to strenuous sport median 28 daysMann et al 2009 [19]Prospective cohort studyLevel IVStudy population: 73 athletes (37/73, 51% professional athletes)Age: median age 30 years (min–max range 16–50 years)Gender: 70/73 (96%) maleClinical presentation: median symptom duration 6 months with no improvement following conservative management, parenteral corticosteroids or previous surgery; all participants had symptoms suggestive of inguinal ligament pathologyLaparoscopic TAPP repair with inguinal ligament tenotomyPain: pain severity from pre-op 7 to post-op 0 ( p  = 0.005); improvement in frequency of pain ( p  < 0.001). 97% reported improvement in symptoms, 73% free of symptomsReturn to play: 73/73 (100%) for all sports return to competitive play at median 28 days’ post-op; 54/73 (74%) reported themselves match-fit by 28 days (31/37 (84%) professionals); 64/73 (88%) reported a return to full-fitness at follow-upComin et al 2013 [4]Randomised controlled trialLevel IIStudy population: 46 participants (20/46, 43% professional athletes)Age: mean age 43.2 years (min–max range 18–67 years)Gender: 46/46 (100%) maleClinical presentation: participants had chronic groin pain > 6-month duration with no obvious structural cause refractory to conservative managementRFD of both ilioinguinal nerve and inguinal ligament versus local anaesthetic and steroid injectionPain: group 1 ( n  = 18) significant improvement in mean visual analogue scale with activity (VASa) at 6 months’ post-treatment ( p  < 0.001) and visual analogue scale at rest (VASr) score at 6 months’ post-treatment ( p  < 0.001); group 2 ( n  = 18) significant improvement in mean VASa at 1-week post-treatment ( p  < 0.001) with no significant difference from baseline at subsequent measurements; group 3 ( n  = 10) significant improvement in mean VASa scores ( p  = 0.007) at 6 months’ post-treatment and mean VASr scores at 6 months’ post-treatment ( p  = 0.017)Return to play: return to play time not measured with functional limitation used insteadMasala et al 2017 [20]Prospective cohort studyLevel IVStudy population: 32 high performance athletes (32/32, 1...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…63/65 (97%) at 10 weeks; 65/65 (100%) at 2 yearsLloyd et al 2008 [13]Retrospective cohort study (with prospective questionnaire)Level IVStudy population: 48 participants (37/48 (77%) were amateur athletes and 11/48 (23%) were manual labourers)Age: median age 38.5 years (min–max range 24–71 years)Gender: 42/48 (87.5%) maleClinical presentation: median duration of pain 18 months; participants with pain > 8 weeks and refractory to conservative management; all participants had localised tenderness over the inguinal ligament and superficial inguinal ringLaparoscopic TAPP repair with inguinal ligament tenotomyPain: pain severity pre-operative 7 to post-operative 3 ( p  < 0.0001); pain frequency score pre-operative 3 to post-operative 1 ( p  = 0.0012)Return to play: of 28/48 (58.3%) who returned questionnaires, 26/28 (92%) returned to normal sporting activity, although time period was not stated; return to strenuous sport median 28 daysMann et al 2009 [19]Prospective cohort studyLevel IVStudy population: 73 athletes (37/73, 51% professional athletes)Age: median age 30 years (min–max range 16–50 years)Gender: 70/73 (96%) maleClinical presentation: median symptom duration 6 months with no improvement following conservative management, parenteral corticosteroids or previous surgery; all participants had symptoms suggestive of inguinal ligament pathologyLaparoscopic TAPP repair with inguinal ligament tenotomyPain: pain severity from pre-op 7 to post-op 0 ( p  = 0.005); improvement in frequency of pain ( p  < 0.001). 97% reported improvement in symptoms, 73% free of symptomsReturn to play: 73/73 (100%) for all sports return to competitive play at median 28 days’ post-op; 54/73 (74%) reported themselves match-fit by 28 days (31/37 (84%) professionals); 64/73 (88%) reported a return to full-fitness at follow-upComin et al 2013 [4]Randomised controlled trialLevel IIStudy population: 46 participants (20/46, 43% professional athletes)Age: mean age 43.2 years (min–max range 18–67 years)Gender: 46/46 (100%) maleClinical presentation: participants had chronic groin pain > 6-month duration with no obvious structural cause refractory to conservative managementRFD of both ilioinguinal nerve and inguinal ligament versus local anaesthetic and steroid injectionPain: group 1 ( n  = 18) significant improvement in mean visual analogue scale with activity (VASa) at 6 months’ post-treatment ( p  < 0.001) and visual analogue scale at rest (VASr) score at 6 months’ post-treatment ( p  < 0.001); group 2 ( n  = 18) significant improvement in mean VASa at 1-week post-treatment ( p  < 0.001) with no significant difference from baseline at subsequent measurements; group 3 ( n  = 10) significant improvement in mean VASa scores ( p  = 0.007) at 6 months’ post-treatment and mean VASr scores at 6 months’ post-treatment ( p  = 0.017)Return to play: return to play time not measured with functional limitation used insteadMasala et al 2017 [20]Prospective cohort studyLevel IVStudy population: 32 high performance athletes (32/32, 1...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one patient received no pain relief following two treatments, although this patient had no evidence of pathology on MRI. 24 of the 32 participants commenced physiotherapy within days of treatment, although the number of days was not specified (Table 2) [20]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations