2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae in Very Close Binaries

Abstract: Pair-instability and pulsational pair-instability supernovae (PPISN) have not been unambiguously observed so far. They are, however, promising candidates for the progenitors of the heaviest binary black hole (BBH) mergers detected. If these BBHs are the product of binary evolution, then PPISNe could occur in very close binaries. Motivated by this, we discuss the implications of a PPISN happening with a close binary companion, and what impact these explosions have on the formation of merging BBHs through binary… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
290
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
13
290
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with the set of ten BBH and one BNS, several outstanding questions remain regarding the origin and evolution of the detected binaries. To date, no binary components have been observed in either of the two putative mass gaps [139,140]-one between NSs and BHs and the other one due to pair instability supernovae [136,219]. Gravitational-wave measurement of BH spins favors either small magnitudes or large misalignment with the orbital angular momentum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the set of ten BBH and one BNS, several outstanding questions remain regarding the origin and evolution of the detected binaries. To date, no binary components have been observed in either of the two putative mass gaps [139,140]-one between NSs and BHs and the other one due to pair instability supernovae [136,219]. Gravitational-wave measurement of BH spins favors either small magnitudes or large misalignment with the orbital angular momentum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input files necessary to reproduce this work and the resulting output files are made freely available at www.mesastar.org. 8 Based on the results of Marchant et al (2019), we evolve systems around the lower edge of the PISN BH mass gap, with initial helium core masses between 30 and 105 M  . We chose to evolve bare helium cores because stars in this mass range are expected to lose their hydrogen-rich envelope long before their death.…”
Section: Evolution Through the Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This removes between a few tenths and a few tens of solar masses of material in a pulsational mass loss episode (PPI) (Yoshida et al 2016;Marchant et al 2019;Woosley 2019). Some stars will undergo "weak" pulsations; these stars undergo PPI instabilities but do not drive a shock sufficient to remove mass (Woosley 2017;Marchant et al 2019). To focus on the impact that this process has on the BH masses, in this study we define only systems that can drive mass loss as undergoing a pulse.…”
Section: Evolution Through the Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have noted that the amount of mass lost is sensitive to the treatment of convection, both before and during the pulses (e.g., Woosley 2017;Marchant et al 2019;Leung et al 2019). Here, we compare two grids of massive bare He core models to highlight the differences resulting from variations in the treatment of time-dependent convection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stars that develop helium (He) core masses exceeding M He 30 M are predicted to encounter the PPI and shed significant amounts of mass in subsequent pulsation episodes (e.g., Rakavy & Shaviv 1967;Yoshida et al 2016;Woosley 2017;Takahashi 2018;Marchant et al 2019;Leung et al 2019;Woosley 2019). The amount of mass lost in these pulses, together with the previous wind mass loss, determines the mass distribution of BHs formed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%