2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4fe5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae. I. Pre-collapse Evolution and Pulsational Mass Ejection

Abstract: We calculate the evolution of massive stars, which undergo pulsational pair-instability (PPI) when the O-rich core is formed. The evolution from the main sequence through the onset of PPI is calculated for stars with initial masses of 80-140 M e and metallicities of Z=10 −3 −1.0 Z e. Because of mass loss, Z0.5 Z e is necessary for stars to form He cores massive enough (i.e., mass >40 M e) to undergo PPI. The hydrodynamical phase of evolution from PPI through the beginning of Fe-core collapse is calculated … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
94
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(107 reference statements)
4
94
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further work is needed to understand the collapse mechanism of these massive cores, and whether we can extrapolate from models of stars that collapse with cores of M 5 10 - to those with cores of » M 50  . Previous studies of PPISN and PISN progenitors have found the location of the PISN mass gap consistent with ours, M 50 53 - (Yoshida et al 2016), » M 48  (Woosley 2017), » M 50  (Leung et al 2019). The small variations in the location of the gap can be attributed to differences in chosen metallicity, mass loss rates, and source of the a g C , O…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Further work is needed to understand the collapse mechanism of these massive cores, and whether we can extrapolate from models of stars that collapse with cores of M 5 10 - to those with cores of » M 50  . Previous studies of PPISN and PISN progenitors have found the location of the PISN mass gap consistent with ours, M 50 53 - (Yoshida et al 2016), » M 48  (Woosley 2017), » M 50  (Leung et al 2019). The small variations in the location of the gap can be attributed to differences in chosen metallicity, mass loss rates, and source of the a g C , O…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This includes = = = = = = These settings have been used in our previous work modeling the dynamical pulsation in pulsation pair-instability supernovae. See Leung et al (2019Leung et al ( , 2020 for the application of these setting to the more massive star counterpart. Furthermore, to ensure the code captures the early oscillation when the simulation has begun, we impose a maximum evolutionary timestep of 10 5 s: = _ max timestep 100000…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an old version of the numerical code MESA and the assumption that the entire He+C+O stellar core after pulsations becomes a black hole -in reality, only bound material contributes -Ref. [12] reports a black hole mass slightly in excess of the value found in Ref. [4].…”
Section: Gw190521mentioning
confidence: 97%