2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Comparison of Three Biological Valves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
59
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…110 We found one multicenter review, 3 some single center reviews, 1,2,4,79 and 3 case reports. 5,6,10 Infections of percutaneously placed PVs are of recent interest 1118 but are beyond the scope of this report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…110 We found one multicenter review, 3 some single center reviews, 1,2,4,79 and 3 case reports. 5,6,10 Infections of percutaneously placed PVs are of recent interest 1118 but are beyond the scope of this report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…27 To date, there is no ideal substitute pulmonary valve; therefore, many patients having PVR can expect to be burdened by further procedures. [28][29][30] Each reintervention carries a risk comparable to the mortality we would currently quote for the primary repair, so aggregated over a lifetime, the consequences of committing a patient at the time of their initial operation to later PVR are significant. Minimizing the burden of late PVR for patients requires addressing 2 uncertainties: how late-adult outcomes should affect decisions made at the time of primary repair and issues about the indications for late PVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[14][15][16][17] However, the timing of PVR is still controversial because of the surgical risk and lack of prosthetic valve longevity. [11][12][13] Calderone et al reported that freedom from valve replacement was 82% at 5 years and 58% at 10 years in all age groups (median age 6.2 years), and that PVR at an early age is associated with a higher rate of valve failure and early reoperation. 12 Moreover, Fiore et al reported that freedom from valve replacement was 92% for bovine pericardial valves and 78% for porcine valves at 5 years in older age patients late after an initial outflow tract reconstruction (median age 22.7 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Moreover, Fiore et al reported that freedom from valve replacement was 92% for bovine pericardial valves and 78% for porcine valves at 5 years in older age patients late after an initial outflow tract reconstruction (median age 22.7 years). 13 Several reports suggest that early PVR with an RVEDVI <150-170 ml/m 2 prevents irreversible RV dysfunction and refractory arrhythmias and leads to normalization of the RV volumes. 1,[14][15][16] In our study, all 3 patients had a severely d-RV and RV dysfunction with refractory arrhythmias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation