2020
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3540-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary <i>Mycobacterium parascrofulaceum</i> Infection in a Patient with Chronic Progressive Pulmonary Aspergillosis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Abstract: A 67-year-old man with a pulmonary cavity was admitted to our hospital. Mycobacterial culture of the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sample obtained from the right upper pulmonary lesion tested positive for mycobacterium, and sequencing of the 16S rRNA genes, hsp65, and rpoB revealed that the cultured mycobacterium was Mycobacterium parascrofulaceum. Treatment with antimycobacterial agents was ineffective, and repeated culturing of bronchoscopic specimens revealed that the specimens were positive for Aspergillus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of MALDI‐TOF MS to identify M. parascrofulaceum would not change the choice of antimicrobials. Although there is no recommended optimal treatment for M. scrofulaceum , a macrolide (clarithromycin or azithromycin) combined with one or two other in vitro active drugs (e.g., a later generation fluoroquinolone, linezolid, amikacin, and a rifamycin with or without ethambutol) appears to be the favorable approach, similarly as for M. parascrofulaceum 32–34 . However, M. parascrofulaceum was first reported in 2004 by Turenne et al, 35 and only a few cases were documented thus far.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability of MALDI‐TOF MS to identify M. parascrofulaceum would not change the choice of antimicrobials. Although there is no recommended optimal treatment for M. scrofulaceum , a macrolide (clarithromycin or azithromycin) combined with one or two other in vitro active drugs (e.g., a later generation fluoroquinolone, linezolid, amikacin, and a rifamycin with or without ethambutol) appears to be the favorable approach, similarly as for M. parascrofulaceum 32–34 . However, M. parascrofulaceum was first reported in 2004 by Turenne et al, 35 and only a few cases were documented thus far.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no recommended optimal treatment for M. scrofulaceum, a macrolide (clarithromycin or azithromycin) combined with one or two other in vitro active drugs (e.g., a later generation fluoroquinolone, linezolid, amikacin, and a rifamycin with or without ethambutol) appears to be the favorable approach, similarly as for M. parascrofulaceum. [32][33][34] However, M. parascrofulaceum was first reported in 2004 by Turenne et al, 35 and only a few cases were documented thus far. Although cutaneous infection in a patient without immunosuppression was also described, this species typically causes respiratory diseases, especially in elderly immunosuppressed patients with predisposing factors.…”
Section: Comparison Of Maldi-tof Ms Discordant Results In Comparison ...mentioning
confidence: 99%