2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3254213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher's Note: “Accurate Atomic Transition Probabilities for Hydrogen, Helium, and Lithium” [J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 38, 565 (2009)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
144
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
144
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our oscillator strength for the above transition match well with the tabulated result as 0.15 in [20]. Nonetheless, our results for the 5d states agree substantially with the results reported by Buchta et al [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our oscillator strength for the above transition match well with the tabulated result as 0.15 in [20]. Nonetheless, our results for the 5d states agree substantially with the results reported by Buchta et al [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nonetheless, our results for the 5d states agree substantially with the results reported by Buchta et al [12]. The measured oscillator strength for the 3d → 4f transition is reported as 0.03 which differ completely from our result 0.14, but our result agrees with the results reported in [20]. With all the above observations, it is worth reiterating that the results reported in this work are more accurate and they can be used reliably in any other applications.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). This line is comparable in strength to C i λ9094.8 (the strongest in the 9100 Å group), the difference in excitation potentials being almost compensated by the difference in oscillator strengths (values in Table 2 are taken from Wiese et al 1996, as retrieved using the NIST Atomic Spectra Database version 3 3 ). It is thus still detected at the lowest metallicities ([Fe/H] < ∼ −3).…”
Section: Lte Abundance Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The calculations of the spontaneous one-photon decay rates can be done, in principle, within the framework of standard quantum electrodynamics and can be found, for example, in [21][22][23]. In particular, from Table II it follows that the transition probabilities W 1 and W 2 arising in the field contribute on the level of partial one-photon decay rates of the np states.…”
Section: Lifetimes and Level Widthsmentioning
confidence: 99%