2020
DOI: 10.1089/hs.2019.0046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Understanding, Perceptions, and Information Sources about Bioterrorism: Pilot Study from the Republic of Serbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women were more engaged in information seeking activities than men, as was also found in the case of the A (H1N1) epidemic [26]. The internet preference over television as information source was previously identified in the research on Serbian publics' opinion about bioterrorism [15]. Obtained results could be explained by the fact that since all respondents were recruited online, they represent preselected internet users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Women were more engaged in information seeking activities than men, as was also found in the case of the A (H1N1) epidemic [26]. The internet preference over television as information source was previously identified in the research on Serbian publics' opinion about bioterrorism [15]. Obtained results could be explained by the fact that since all respondents were recruited online, they represent preselected internet users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Although Serbian officials followed WHO Guidelines and collaborated with the experts from the China following the declaration of the state of emergency, and have urged Serbian citizens to do the same, the public was not prepared for an epidemic. Even though history testifies to a small number of serious epidemics and researchers have found evidences of poor knowledge and preparedness of Serbian public about epidemics [13,14] and infectious agents used as biological weapons [15], little has been done to prevent epidemics and pandemics. Given that Serbia suffered great losses in the May 2014 floods, the most of the government attention was focused to emergency management in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, knowledge of the concepts, modes of transmission, and epidemiological characteristics of bioterrorism should be enhanced among public groups to raise public awareness of bioterrorism. It has been argued that the public is important for effective knowledge dissemination, but their understanding of and attitudes toward bioterrorism lack widespread attention (56). A study also pointed out that in addition to national military training, it is important to ensure that a country's citizens are equipped to effectively respond to bioterrorism (57).…”
Section: Knowledge Of Bioterrorismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological and non-biological factors affect the values of the examined biomarkers in populations [Freitas Leal JK, 2017]. The most important are genetics, public policies and regulations (vaccination campaigns), health (financing, diagnosis and treatment of diseases), life habits (smoking, physical activity, hydration of the organism), social and environmental factors (bioterrorism, hygiene, environmental pollution, infections, drugs, nutrition, religion and ethnicity) [Radovanovic-Nenadic U, 2020; Ramaswami R, 2018].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%