2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235191
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Leading academic institutions, governments, and funders of research across the world have spent the last few decades fretting publicly about the need for scientists and research organisations to engage more widely with the public and be open about their research. While a global literature asserts that public communication has changed from a virtue to a duty for scientists in many countries and disciplines, our knowledge about what research institutions are doing and what factors drive their 'going public' is v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All strata were equally represented in the sampling frames (N = 200 institutes per area of research, per country) so that results would not be biased towards fields engaging more in public communication. The study has a 25% response rate, which is in line with what is expected for online-based surveys, and is considered good when the sampling units are organisations rather than individuals (Sheehan, 2001;Shih and Fan, 2008) (see Entradas et al, 2020, for a detailed description of methods, including sample design, data collection, and national samples).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All strata were equally represented in the sampling frames (N = 200 institutes per area of research, per country) so that results would not be biased towards fields engaging more in public communication. The study has a 25% response rate, which is in line with what is expected for online-based surveys, and is considered good when the sampling units are organisations rather than individuals (Sheehan, 2001;Shih and Fan, 2008) (see Entradas et al, 2020, for a detailed description of methods, including sample design, data collection, and national samples).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…To address these research questions, we build on a previous framework (Entradas et al, 2020) that conceptualises institutional public communication as a function of context factors (C factors) and public communication disposition factors (D factors) that are likely to influence communication activity (e.g. Kreimer et al, 2011;Bentley and Kyvik, 2011;Mejlgaard et al, 2019, Entradas andBauer, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is important to mention that the analysis has a limitation with regards to the countries where the projects have been developed. Twitter had a different degree of influence and presence depending on the country and when this social network gained and increased popularity in disseminating data using social media [48,49]. In this respect, in future developments it will be interesting and relevant to explore where the projects were based.…”
Section: Paper Limitations and Further Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gestão do saber é importante para a conversão do conhecimento empírico ou tácito em explícito e métodos apropriados de registro e divulgação são fundamentais para seu êxito (Câmara & Nunes, 2021). Entradas et al (2020) em estudo transnacional verificaram que o Brasil frente aos demais países no mundo continua a veicular suas pesquisas por meio de eventos e mídia científica tradicional, mas tem ultimamente experienciado redes sociais para agilizar a comunicação e gerar maior visibilidade para o público geral. A pesquisa acadêmica sempre está em movimento e a coleta de informação a partir de investigações prévias, sumarizadas em indicadores cienciométricos, pode ser uma rota útil para dimensionar determinada área de interesse ou redes colaborativas (Castro-Silva et al, 2021;Medeiros & Vasconcelos, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified