1975
DOI: 10.1037/h0076760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.

Abstract: A scale was constructed to assess individual differences in self-consciousness. Norms and test-retest reliability are presented. Factor analysis of the scale revealed that self-consciousness has three components: public, private, and social anxiety. The relationships among these three factors are examined. The scale was found useful in research on social behavior, and its implications for research and therapy are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

66
2,401
13
89

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,277 publications
(2,638 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
66
2,401
13
89
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-Consciousness Scale (SCS; Fenigstein et al, 1975). This well-known 23-item measure has three subscales.…”
Section: Convergent and Discriminant Scales Neo Personality Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-Consciousness Scale (SCS; Fenigstein et al, 1975). This well-known 23-item measure has three subscales.…”
Section: Convergent and Discriminant Scales Neo Personality Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were then administered a battery of questionnaires including: the Self-Consciousness Questionnaire (Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975), the Body Image Scale from the Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory (DSFI; Derogatis, 1978), the Female Sexual Function Index (Rosen et al, 2000), and the Sexual Satisfaction Scale (Meston & Trapnell, 2005). Following completion of the questionnaires, participants engaged in one of two experimental conditions: self-focus, no self-focus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional personality measures reflecting managers' level of self-focus were assessed with the 18-item true-false revised version of the self-monitoring questionnaire (Snyder, 1987) and the original 23-item 0 to 4 Likert-type scale version of the SC scale (Fenigstein et al, 1975). Both instruments have been widely used for research purposes and have been tested on multiple samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hypothesis 2) Individual differences in convergent theories of personality must also be considered in any attempt to explain differences in the level of agreement in performance ratings. In particular, both the self-monitoring (Snyder, 1974(Snyder, , 1987) and the self-consciousness constructs (e.g., Buss, 1980;Fenigstein, 1987;Fenigstein et al, 1975) appear to have direct relevance to the level of self-other agreement obtained if this measure in fact reflects an appropriate operationalization of MSA. In summary, self-monitoring theory posits that individuals differ on the extent to which they actively monitor, regulate, and/or control their own expressive behaviors in the presence of others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%