1999
DOI: 10.1159/000023492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pubertal Growth of the Short Normal Girl

Abstract: Objectives: To determine the timing, magnitude and duration of the pubertal spurt for short normal and average height girls, to compare these with Tanner’s standard and to investigate predictors of pubertal growth. Methods: The growth of 46 short normal and 55 control girls, identified at school entry, was monitored throughout puberty. Height and weight were measured at 6-month intervals from which body mass index (BMI) was derived. Annual velocities were calculated and used to estimate the age and magnitude o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Total pubertal growth in centimeters is, for the general population, statistically similar between individuals of average height and those that are short, at least within ranges between −2 and −3 SDS (Mulligan, Bailey, Voss, & Betts, ). This also implies that height position in SDS at pubertal start will also be the position of final adult height for those that have average ages for puberty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total pubertal growth in centimeters is, for the general population, statistically similar between individuals of average height and those that are short, at least within ranges between −2 and −3 SDS (Mulligan, Bailey, Voss, & Betts, ). This also implies that height position in SDS at pubertal start will also be the position of final adult height for those that have average ages for puberty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…adverse life events, familial conflict, parental stability, father absence, housing quality, sibling number and order, child behavioural problems and child psychological adjustment). At the very least, studies including SES typically measured it as a scale variable with education, income or both (Adair, 2001;Akther & Islam, 2012;Blell et al, 2008;Deardorff et al, 2011;Ellis & Essex, 2007;Kirchengast & Bauer, 2007;Moffitt et al, 1992;Mulligan et al, 1999;Nieczuja-Dwojacka et al, 2018;Orden et al, 2011;Rao et al, 1998;Tan & Camras, 2015;Windham et al, 2008). Other psychosocial factors used instead of or in addition to income-education SES markers included birth order (Akther & Islam, 2012;Deardorff et al, 2011;Krzyzanowska et al, 2016), recall of time lived in poverty (Reagan et al, 2012), family size or number of siblings (Akther & Islam, 2012;Krzyzanowska et al, 2016;Windham et al, 2008), housing conditions or crowding (Blell et al, 2008;Deardorff et al, 2011;Khan et al, 1996;Krzyzanowska et al, 2016) and social mobility (Krzyzanowska et al, 2016).…”
Section: Search Results and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified 20 studies (<2% of non-duplicate search results returned) that simultaneously assessed the effects of psychosocial and childhood energetic status on pubertal timing (Table 2). Seven of these studies were designed primarily to investigate energetic effects on pubertal timing (Adair, 2001; Khan et al, 1996; Krzyzanowska et al, 2016; Mulligan et al, 1999; Nieczuja-Dwojacka et al, 2018; Rao et al, 1998; Stark et al, 1989), but analyses adjusted for or separately analysed psychosocial influences as well. Conversely, seven studies explicitly assessed psychosocial effects but adjusted for or separately analysed energetic factors (Braithwaite et al, 2009; Ellis & Essex, 2007; Graber et al, 1995; Moffitt et al, 1992; Reagan et al, 2012; Tan & Camras, 2015; Windham et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since recruitment, height and weight have been measured at 6-monthly intervals until the completion of puberty and annually thereafter. Growth data were used to determine the age at peak height velocity [18]. Wherever possible parents were measured, otherwise an estimate of height was obtained from self/partner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%