2012
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514c.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PTU-156 Dietary response in coeliac disease should be assessed by repeat duodenal biopsy

Abstract: million (ppm) using a QuinTron BreathTracker DP at baseline, thendafter 75 g oral glucosedat 20 min time points up to 3 h or until positive. Positive test: fasting H 2 $20 or CH 4 $10 ppm or a rise in H 2 $12 or CH 4 $6 ppm. Some patients also had duodenal aspirates collected endoscopically. Positive result: >10 4 colony forming units/ml. Patients with positive tests were treated with antibiotics. Results were assessed retrospectively. Results 126 patients, 66 males and 60 females, median group age 61 years (r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly the length of time for mucosal recovery to occur depends on the patient's learning curve for dietary gluten exclusion. In a study performed in Cambridge, approximately 25% of patients reverted to normal intestinal mucosa within a year, with a further 30% showing minor inflammation without villous atrophy [Corbett et al 2012]. In those with ongoing villous atrophy, similar proportions respond to more stringent dietary gluten exclusion with mucosal recovery [Sharkey et al 2012].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly the length of time for mucosal recovery to occur depends on the patient's learning curve for dietary gluten exclusion. In a study performed in Cambridge, approximately 25% of patients reverted to normal intestinal mucosa within a year, with a further 30% showing minor inflammation without villous atrophy [Corbett et al 2012]. In those with ongoing villous atrophy, similar proportions respond to more stringent dietary gluten exclusion with mucosal recovery [Sharkey et al 2012].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%