2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychopathic personality features and risks for criminal justice system involvement among emancipating foster youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychopathy likely serves as a catalyst to explain the heterotypic continuity and overall life failure that is characteristic of persons with high-rate criminal careers (Raine et al, 2005;Vaughn, Litschge, et al, 2008;Vaughn, Newhill, et al, 2008). In a longitudinal study, Ullrich, Farrington, and Coid (2008) found that psychopathic personality features were negatively associated with status, wealth, and successful interpersonal and intimate relationships.…”
Section: Psychopathymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Psychopathy likely serves as a catalyst to explain the heterotypic continuity and overall life failure that is characteristic of persons with high-rate criminal careers (Raine et al, 2005;Vaughn, Litschge, et al, 2008;Vaughn, Newhill, et al, 2008). In a longitudinal study, Ullrich, Farrington, and Coid (2008) found that psychopathic personality features were negatively associated with status, wealth, and successful interpersonal and intimate relationships.…”
Section: Psychopathymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This was in addition to the most severe CP and highest self-reported delinquency. Overall, researchers using diverse analytical techniques on different research groups have linked CU traits to antisocial behavior and related maladaptive outcomes among samples of foster care youths (Vaughn, DeLisi, Beaver, & Wright, 2009a; Vaughn, Litschge, DeLisi, Beaver, & McMillen, 2008), clinic-referred samples of male children and adolescents (Burke, Loeber, & Lahey, 2007), community samples of high school students (Jolliffe & Farrington, 2006), community samples of high-risk youths (Pardini, Obradović, & Loeber, 2006), and correctional samples of institutionalized delinquents (Caputo, Frick, & Brodsky, 1999; Pardini, Lochman, & Frick, 2003; Vaughn & DeLisi, 2008; Vaughn, DeLisi, Beaver, Wright, & Howard, 2007). …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gretton et al (2004) controlled for conduct disorder, age at first offenses, and history of violent and nonviolent offending; they failed to control for contextual and familial factors believed to be important. Similarly, Vaughn et al (2008) controlled for race, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, substance abuse, family support, childhood trauma, neighborhood disorder, and deviant peers; they did not include other potentially relevant individual difference variables such as intelligence or impulsivity. The article by Salekin included the most comprehensive set of control variables including race, education, an intelligence screening test, past charges, school absences and tardies, family structure, delinquent peers, and several dichotomous variables assessing whether the mother and father worked, whether the mother or father had ever been arrested, and whether the youth had ever used drugs.…”
Section: Child and Adolescent Psychopathymentioning
confidence: 99%