“…Investigators often seem inclined to respond to a general absence of meaningful research findings by attempting to "fine-tune" the measures of ethical judgments and to create combinations of survey items that differ from those presented in the 1990 version of the MES (see Table 1; e.g., Hansen, 1992;Kujala, 2001;Kujala and Pietilainen, 2007;Kujala, Lamsa, and Penttila, 2011;McMahon and Harvey, 2007b). Researcher tendencies to report detailed results of factor analyses of ethical judgments survey items, or even to refer to such analyses in passing (e.g., Tansey, Hyman, and Brown, 1992; fifty relevant studies are identified in the list of references), also seemingly suggests an ongoing search for the "correct" item combinations or a "better" measure.…”