Psychometric Properties of the Expanded Version of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in a Turkish Population

Irak, Metehan; Albayrak, Ece Oral

doi:10.1177/0033294118813844

Cited by 15 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Internal consistency was high (i.e., 𝜔 > .8) for all scales except Euphoria and Ordering. Concerning Euphoria, similar results were obtained using the original IDAS-II and its existing translations (De la Rosa-Cáceres et al, 2020;Irak & Albayrak, 2020;Watson et al, 2012). This lower internal consistency might be due to the fact that Euphoria, as a symptom dimension of bipolar disorder, is broader than other scales and contains items tapping into elevated mood (e.g., "I felt elated for no special reason"), heightened energy (e.g., "I had so much energy it was hard for me to sit still"), and grandiosity (e.g., "I felt that I could do things that other people couldn't").…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

“…Furthermore, Stasik-O'Brien et al (2019) showed that IDAS-II scales are good predictors of their associated DSM-IV as well as DSM-5 diagnoses and provided cut-off scores for different uses. Recently, Turkish (Irak & Albayrak, 2020) and Spanish (De la Rosa-Cáceres et al, 2020) versions of the IDAS-II have been developed and shown to exhibit similar psychometric properties as the original version.…”

Section: Inventory Of Depression and Anxiety Symptomsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We tested the three-factor structure proposed by Watson et al (2012) by conducting a CFA. In contrast to validation studies of the Turkish (Irak & Albayrak, 2020) Gain and Appetite Loss it would make sense to allow for residual correlations, since both are hypothesized to be influenced by Distress, yet both are mutually exclusive (Watson et al, 2013).…”

Section: Scale-level Cfamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Development and Validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms II – German Version

Wester¹,

Rubel²,

Zimmermann³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Expanded Version of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS-II) is a 99-item self-report measure containing 18 nonoverlapping dimensional scales assessing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and mania. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a German adaptation of the IDAS-II. Participants from a community sample (N = 1054) completed the IDAS-II (German version) and a series of additional measures of depression and anxiety disorders. Item-level confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) confirmed unidimensionality and indicated good internal consistency of most symptom scales. A CFA of the IDAS-II scales based on exploratory results by Watson et al (2012) confirmed a three factor model of Distress, Obsessions/Fear, and Positive Mood. Correlational analyses with additional symptom measures supported convergent and discriminant validity. The IDAS-II (German Version) allows for a reliable assessment of severity of depression, anxiety, and bipolar symptoms, and is one of the first clinical measures for German-speaking samples that is consistent with the Hierarchical Taxonomy Of Psychopathology (HiTOP).

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

Section: Inventory Of Depression and Anxiety Symptomsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Scale-level Cfamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development and Validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms II – German Version

Wester¹,

Rubel²,

Zimmermann³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Turkish validity and reliability studies were performed by Irak. The Turkish IDAS-II subscales revealed Cronbach's alpha values ranged between 0.947 and 0.949 and the items have a relatively high internal consistency [11].…”

Section: Clinical Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anxiety and depression symptoms in the same pregnant women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Ayaz

Hocaoğlu

Günay

et al. 2020

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

166

168

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesWith clinical experience from previous coronavirus infections, public health measures and fear of infection may have negative psychological effects on pregnant women. This study aimed to compare the level of anxiety and depression in the same pregnant women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsThe pregnant women continuing pregnancy who participated in the first study which was undertaken to clarify the factors associated with mental health of pregnant women before the COVID-19 pandemic, were included for the current study during the outbreak. Anxiety and depression symptoms of the same pregnant women were evaluated by using the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms II and Beck Anxiety Inventory twice before and during the pandemic.ResultsA total of 63 pregnant women completed questionnaires. The mean age of the women and the mean gestational age was 30.35±5.27 years and 32.5±7 weeks, respectively. The mean total IDAS II score was found to increase from 184.78±49.67 (min: 109, max: 308) to 202.57±52.90 (min: 104, max: 329) before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. According to the BAI scores the number of patients without anxiety (from 10 to 6) and with mild anxiety (from 31 to 24) decreased and patients with moderate (from 20 to 25) and severe anxiety (from 2 to 8) increased after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that obesity and relationship with her husband are the best predictors of IDAS II scores.ConclusionsThis study indicated that COVID-19 outbreak affects the mental health of pregnant women negatively which leads to adverse birth outcomes. The level of anxiety and depression symptoms of pregnant women during the COVID-19 infection significantly increased. Healthcare professionals should establish comprehensive treatment plans for pregnant women who are highly vulnerable population to prevent mental trauma during the infectious disease outbreaks.

show abstract

“…Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory were applied to the patients at the discretion of the paediatric psychiatrist. 11,12 After a detailed clinical evaluation, patients without any causes to explain chest pain were considered as idiopathic.…”

Section: Diagnostic Categoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aetiological evaluation of chest pain in childhood and adolescence

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Chest pain, as a common cause of hospital admissions in childhood, necessitates detailed investigations due to a wide range of differential diagnoses. In this study, we aimed to determine the distribution of diseases causing chest pain in children and investigate the clinical characteristics of children with chest pain.Methods:This study included 782 patients aged between 3 and 18 years who presented to a paediatric cardiology outpatient clinic with chest pain between April 2017 and March 2018. Aetiological causes and demographic features of the patients were analysed.Results:Most prevalent causes of chest pain were musculoskeletal system (33%) and psychogenic (28.4%) causes. Chest pain due to cardiac reasons was seen in eight patients (1%). Diseases of musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal systems and psychogenic disorders were significantly more common in male and female patients, respectively (p < 0.001 for all). In winter, patients’ age and the number of patients with ≥12 years were higher than those in other seasons (p < 0.001). Most of the parents (70.8%) and patients (90.2%) thought that chest pain in their children was caused by cardiac causes.Conclusion:Most of the diagnoses for chest pain in childhood period are benign and include the musculoskeletal system and psychogenic diseases. Although chest pain due to cardiac diseases is rare, a comprehensive analysis of medical history, detailed physical examination and cardiac imaging with echocardiography is needed to reach more accurate diagnoses.

show abstract

Psychometric Properties of the Expanded Version of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in a Turkish Population

Cited by 15 publications

References 54 publications

Development and Validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms II – German Version

Development and Validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms II – German Version

Anxiety and depression symptoms in the same pregnant women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Aetiological evaluation of chest pain in childhood and adolescence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About