Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey

Abstract

Background The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPSR) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey enables patients to report their experiences with outpatient medical offices. Objective To evaluate the factor structure and reliability of the CAHPS Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Adult Visit Survey. Data Source Data from 21,318 patients receiving care in 450 clinical practice sites collected from March 2010 to December 2010 were analyzed from the CG-CAHPS Database. Research Design and Participants Individual level and multilevel confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine CAHPS survey responses at the patient and practice site levels. We also estimated internal consistency reliability and practice site level reliability. Correlations among multi-item composites and correlations between the composites and two global rating items were examined. Measures Scores on CG-CAHPS composites assessing Access to Care, Doctor Communication, Courteous/Helpful Staff, and two global ratings of whether one would Recommend their Doctor, and an Overall Doctor Rating. Results Analyses provide support for the hypothesized three-factor model assessing Access to Care, Doctor Communication, and Courteous/Helpful Staff. In addition, the internal consistency reliabilities were 0.77 or higher and practice site level reliabilities for sites with more than four clinicians were 0.75 or higher. All composites were positively and significantly correlated with the two global rating items, with Doctor Communication having the strongest relationship with the global ratings. Conclusions The CG-CAHPS Adult Visit Survey has acceptable psychometric properties at the individual level and practice site level. The analyses suggest that the survey items are measuring their intended concepts and yield reliable information.

Associations Between Antidepressant Adherence and Shared Decision-Making, Patient–Provider Trust, and Communication Among Adults with Diabetes: Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)

“…Items assessing trust and shared decision-making were analyzed individually and coded dichotomously as better ("always") versus worse ("never"/"sometimes"/"usually") quality, based on the distribution of responses, as few participants reported worse quality ( Table 2). The CAHPS communication items have high internal consistency 15,21 and were combined to create a CAHPS summary variable for each participant who responded to as least two CAHPS items. A participant who answered "always" for all CAHPS items was classified as having better quality communication, whereas one who responded "never", "sometimes", or "usually" to any of the items was classified as having worse quality.…”

Communication Skills Training for Physicians Improves Patient Satisfaction

“…In contrast, the outpatient experience survey (Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems; CGCAHPS) is provider-specific, may soon be required, and may provide more reliable data on which to base improvement efforts. 4 Because experience scores are an important element of determining reimbursement under value-based purchasing, hospitals and physicians have a strong incentive to improve HCAHPS and CGCAHPS scores. However, there are few proven methods for doing so.…”

Possibilities for Shortening the CAHPS Clinician and Group Survey

“…[7][8][9] The survey also includes a single item asking respondents to provide an overall rating of their provider on a 0-10 scale ( Table 2).…”